Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7430 p681
9 December 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Kidney disease prescribing information “too vague”

Prescribing information for health care professionals treating patients with kidney disease is too vague, concludes the latest issue of the Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin.

The DTB reviews methods for identifying and classifying chronic kidney disease in adults and sets out the implications of the disease for patients’ health. It also offers advice on prescribing for patients with chronic kidney disease.

It suggests that information provided in summaries of product characteristics (SPCs) can be unhelpful, stating that drugs should be used “with caution” in patients with kidney disease without explaining what that means in practice, but it reminds prescribers that they can seek guidance from local medicines information services and from specialist pharmacists.

Andrea Devaney, lead renal pharmacist at the Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust and a committee member of the UK Renal Pharmacy Group, commented: “I would support and encourage, on behalf of the UK Renal Pharmacy Group, the authors’ advice for prescribers to contact specialist renal pharmacists for further guidance on drug dosing in renal impairment.”

She added that new chronic kidney disease guidelines and national reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values will improve recognition of the condition. “But caution must be applied when extrapolating eGFR values for drug dosing. Most published reference texts recommend doses based on non-normalised estimates of GFR (Cockcroft and Gault estimates). In practice, I believe, Cockcroft and Gault will remain the gold standard for dosage adjustment in chronic kidney disease until such a time as reference tests recommend doses based on GFR normalised for body size.

“The ‘Renal drug handbook’ goes some way to fill the dosing gaps highlighted by the authors in SPCs and the BNF since it includes practical, anecdotal dosage recommendations often based on experience from the front line.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal