Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7431 p736
16 December 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 90K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· The Society (3)
· The profession (3)
· Methadone dispensing
· CD prescribing (2)
· Dispensing
· Dress codes
· Pharmacy services
· Work breaks
· Pharmacy in Spain


Letters to the Editor

Pharmacy services

Finding the evidence

From Mr T. G. Burnham

Donal Markey’s submission to the All-Party Pharmacy Group’s inquiry into the future of pharmacy (PJ, 2 December, p655) rightly emphasised the need for good, UK-based evidence of service improvements resulting from the involvement of pharmacists, if GPs are to consider them once practice-based commissioning becomes the rule.

A report1 on practice-based commissioning by the Centre for Public Policy and Health at Durham University, based on feedback from regional workshops and attended mainly by GPs, practice managers and primary care trust staff, hardly mentions pharmacy, but quotes the comment that “there are plenty of people … who will be more than happy to march down your street and provide services you are too busy to do”.

My impression is that some UK-based evidence on the benefits of pharmacy-based services exists, and some of it is of good quality. However, only a minority is published in conventional, peer-reviewed journals indexed by the larger medical databases.2

Much more is found only in the so-called “grey literature” — reports, theses and conference proceedings. A small study3 found that only 10 to 15 per cent of papers presented at UK and European pharmacy conferences were eventually published in journals — compared with some 50 per cent for papers at medical conferences — and that the average delay between conference presentation and journal publication was about a year.

Pharm-line, the bibliographic database on medicines management, pharmacy practice and prescribing compiled by UK Medicines Information (UKMi), indexes several thousand papers a year relating to the evidence sought by Donal Markey, and has been attempting to improve access by including relevant “grey literature” and online journals in addition to traditional journals. A recent comparison4 found that Pharm-line was more comprehensive than either Medline or Embase in its coverage of publications cited in UK-related papers on medicines management.

Tom Burnham
Pharm-line Database Manager
Guy’s Hospital,
London SE1


References

1. Marks L, Hunter DJ. Practice based commissioning — policy into practice

2. Child D, Cantrill J, Cooke J. The effectiveness of hospital pharmacy in the UK: methodology for finding the evidence. Pharmacy World and Science 2004;26:44–51.

3. Burnham T. Are papers presented at European pharmacy conferences published in journals? A preliminary study. Paper presented at the 28th UK Medicines Information Conference, September 2002.

4. Burnham T. Comparison of Pharm-line, Embase and Medline coverage of UK oriented medicines management literature. Paper presented at the 32nd UK Medicines Information Conference, September 2006.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Dress codes)
Next Topic (Work breaks)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal