Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7431 p736
16 December 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 90K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· The Society (3)
· The profession (3)
· Methadone dispensing
· CD prescribing (2)
· Dispensing
· Dress codes
· Pharmacy services
· Work breaks
· Pharmacy in Spain


Letters to the Editor

Work breaks

There has to be a balance

From Ms L. Hackett

I read with great interest Lindsey Gilpin’s letter about work breaks (PJ, 9 December, p687). Mrs Gilpin states that “pharmacists are expected to work for ridiculously long periods without taking breaks”. This is contrary to what I have found.

In my experience, it is locums themselves who are requesting to work these extended hours and companies that are eager to put breaks and lunch hours in place. My agency places many locums in 100-hour pharmacies and I have a number who request to work a full day from 7am to 11pm. In stores where two shifts are offered — 8am until 6pm or 10pm — more often than not locums opt to do the longer shift. The locum takes a rest whenever it is quiet and takes a break for refreshments wherever possible. At stores where a lunch hour is listed, most locums will ask me if they can work through, thus being paid an additional £22–£25 for the day.

My view is that it should be up to pharmacists themselves. Some can cope with the longer hours and some clearly prefer not to. If a compulsory lunch break is in place, say, from 1pm to 2pm, it is not good customer service to close if there are queues waiting to see the pharmacist and collect prescriptions just because the clock says they have to close. Sensible judgements from the pharmacists surely should be the order of the day. If it is busy, wait until a quieter time and then take a break. I do try, where possible, to negotiate with the companies, and to offer an option that the locums can make their own decisions.

I believe that if companies could pay pharmacists through the lunch hour regardless of whether a break is taken, then this may solve the issue. Locums would feel as though they are not missing out financially by taking a break, and they would be minimising errors by being less tired. However, I appreciate this would not bode too well with companies, which are fighting to meet budgets and maximise profits. There has to be a balance and I think it should rest with pharmacists themselves to be responsible enough to find that balance.

Lisa Hackett
Gemini Professionals Locum Agency

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Pharmacy services)
Next Topic (Pharmacy in Spain)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal