Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7433 p4
6 January 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Three more companies discredit the industry

Three more companies are revealed to have recently brought discredit on the UK pharmaceutical industry in the latest batch of rulings published by the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority.

The November code of practice review — published by the PMCPA, which enforces the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry’s code of practice — reveals that Pfizer brought discredit on the industry by linking the provision of the services of nurse advisers at medical practices to the use of Lipitor (atorvastatin).

Janssen-Cilag was ruled to have brought discredit on the industry because its public relations company offered to pay journalists £200 each to attend a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence appeal hearing over NICE’s decision not to recommend the use of erythropoietins for chemotherapy-induced anaemia, including Eprex (epoetin alfa). Janssen-Cilag was held responsible for the actions of its PR company, even though it did not know about the offer.

Daiichi-Sankyo was ruled to have discredited the industry for a second time for reusing an advertisement that had previously been found in breach of the code.

The November PMCPA review also provides details of how Merck Sharp & Dohme brought discredit on the industry (PJ, 7 October 2006, p417) and its subsequent suspension from ABPI membership. The ABPI reinstated MSD’s membership on 3 January, although it said the comany’s compliance should be audited within six months.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal