Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7434 p48-49
13 January 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 90K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• Pharmacy practice
• Health economics
• Dispensing errors
• Controlled drugs
• Ethics
• Adverse events
• Regulation
• Fitness to practise
• The Society (2)
• Retention fees (5)
• Pharmacy politicians
• The Journal (2)


Letters to the Editor

Regulation

Northern Ireland should have its say

From Mr T. Maguire, FPSNI

A long time ago the Government decided on the form of regulation it wanted for pharmacy. Since then it has sat back, pulled the strings and watched pharmacy go about the hard work of bringing this Government vision into being. This effort has created chaos and mayhem; it has resulted in “bloodletting”, has destroyed relations and will cause friction within the profession for years to come. This destruction has been costly and unnecessary. In this strange, perverse drama, the profession has brutalised itself, surrendering professional self-regulation, while implementing a regulatory system dominated by lay people.

Of course, this has nothing to do with shortcomings in pharmacy regulation or public protection. Rather it reflects the arrogant ideology of the ruling political party. Forget evidence-based professional regulation, Andy Burnham (and his good friend, Paul Googins in Northern Ireland) has been given the job of doing a job on the pharmacy profession.

Had we been honest about this, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s Council debate might have been more productive (PJ, 16 December 2006, p750). The report on the debate was, sadly, far from inspiring. I did not attend, of course, but then, no one from Northern Ireland did — were we invited?

Some might say that, since I am from Northern Ireland and a member of the Pharmaceutical Society of Northern Ireland, this debate is none of my business. Yet Northern Ireland was mentioned twice in the report and whereas these were well meaning references, the way they were reported merely reflected a patronising attempt at accommodating a difficult family member.

Decisions to do with the regulation of pharmacy in Northern Ireland, with respect to all Council members, is a matter for pharmacists in Northern Ireland. This might come as a surprise to many in Lambeth but there you have it. There are other models to be considered. The PSNI has been an independent body for over 80 years and before that we were members of the Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland. There is a real sense that any merger would destroy local leadership for the profession at a time when devolution is really getting a hold. This would not be in the best interests of pharmacy.

Terry Maguire
Belfast

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Adverse events)
Next Topic (Fitness to practise)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal