Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7436 p106
27 January 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 90K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• Fitness to practise (2)
• CD storage
• Aspirin
• Pharmacist prescribing
• English pharmacy board
• Society publications
• Onlooker
• The Journal
• Ethics (2)
• Retention fees (2)
• The Society


Letters to the Editor

Aspirin

Pack size limits are illogical

From Mr R. Murchie

I read the Broad spectrum article “Expensive drugs are cheap, it is the cheap drugs that are expensive” with interest (PJ, 9 December 2006, p686).

I am not a pharmacist but my wife is, and I read in The Journal many years ago that 75mg of aspirin a day was an excellent prophylactic for stroke. Being over 60 years of age at the time, I took the lesson to heart and began buying and taking the said 75mg aspirin a day. The government took fright at the few people who killed themselves with paracetamol and banned sales of more than 36 tablets per packet in a pharmacy or 25 elsewhere of any over the counter non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs regardless of their mass. In passing I grumbled to my doctor about the stupidity of whatever government department responsible. He told me he would add the aspirin to my repeat prescription for hypertension and ever since I have saved the £4.50 and cost the NHS my share of the £53m referred to in John Wilson’s Broad spectrum piece.

I suspect the Government’s action was to avoid appearing to favour aspirin and ibuprofen over paracetamol, a commercial reasoning when only clinical reasoning should have applied. The decision to base it on tablet numbers baffles me; surely it is the mass ingested that kills you.

Roy Murchie
Colchester, Essex

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (CD storage)
Next Topic (Pharmacist prescribing)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal