Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7436 p106
27 January 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 90K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• Fitness to practise (2)
• CD storage
• Aspirin
• Pharmacist prescribing
• English pharmacy board
• Society publications
• Onlooker
• The Journal
• Ethics (2)
• Retention fees (2)
• The Society


Letters to the Editor

English pharmacy board

Let the English board’s voice be heard

From Mr C. Morris, MRPharmS

I said that I would listen to anyone that had a view regarding the future of pharmacy and, now that I have been elected to the English Pharmacy Board of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, I stand by that. I believe that elected officials are the employees of the electorate and I am nowhere near conceited enough to think I have the answers for all pharmacy’s problems so I am asking for pharmacists’ input.

Pharmacists can e-mail me at cmorris@epb.hotmail.co.uk. I also have a website at www.pharmacistance.co.uk, which has links to most of the major pharmaceutical sites and I plan to have links to all of the topics to be discussed at the EPB meetings so that they can be seen beforehand and also the minutes of past meetings. I am a moderator of www.pharmacy-forum.co.uk, a forum for the discussion of pharmacy, and a regular poster on www.locumvoice.co.uk, a forum for discussing locum issues run by my fellow EPB member Lindsey Gilpin. Finally, I am a member of www.private-Rx.com, an e-mail discussion group that has been running for several years. Pharmacists can get a message to me at any of these places and might even see debates that they can and want to contribute to.

There are several pharmacy groups that I plan to contact but if anyone thinks that their group needs a say, then they should contact me.

I believe that part of the problem at the moment is that the profession of pharmacy is becoming ever more multipartite. We have a number of groups representing different areas and calls for more every day. I think that a lot of pharmacists are disillusioned with the direction in which the profession is moving and they want a voice to be heard and I cannot blame them for wanting to form support groups for their own little or even not so little niche but I think that we have to pull together as a profession now regardless of the area of the profession that we represent.

The Royal Pharmaceutical Society as we know it may split. If this comes to pass a group may be set up to support and represent pharmacists and the profession as a whole — something which has seemed to me to be sadly lacking for a long time.

Maybe this group will be the EPB, maybe not, but I would like to think that the EPB could be a group that represents pharmacists anyway. Whether this will be possible I really do not know but I am going to try to push for this. I hope pharmacists wish us all luck with this as I do not believe that anyone has put up for election to this board to do the profession down.

Regardless of how the Society’s functions might split and regardless of the name given to the representative arm I believe that we all need to pull together and act as a single professional front.

To this end I ask again, let the EPB be a voice for pharmacists regardless of background and I hope to hear from pharmacists soon.

Chris Morris
English Pharmacy Board Member
Royal Pharmaceutical Society

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Pharmacist prescribing)
Next Topic (Society publications)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal