Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7436 p108
27 January 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 90K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• Fitness to practise (2)
• CD storage
• Aspirin
• Pharmacist prescribing
• English pharmacy board
• Society publications
• Onlooker
• The Journal
• Ethics (2)
• Retention fees (2)
• The Society


Letters to the Editor

Retention fees

Overseas fee should be reduced as PJ is available online (Mr P. B. Buckley)

Comparison with nurses (Mr D. R. Kaye)

Overseas fee should be reduced as PJ is available online

From Mr P. B. Buckley, MRPharmS

At this time of the year many of us have just paid our annual retention fees and may even have pondered a little as to how our fees relate to costs and benefits.

Retired or non-practising overseas members may particularly wonder why they are required to pay twice as much as their non-practising UK colleagues (£112 vs £58) for essentially the same the privileges of retaining membership and receiving the printed PJ by post. Overseas air mail is, admittedly, expensive and no doubt previously justified the difference in rates.

Nowadays, however, all members have free internet access to PJ Online and can print out selected parts at will on the nearest printer. I am sure that many overseas members would prefer to read the PJ online on the day it is published rather than pay double membership fees for the doubtful privilege of receiving the printed version a week later by post.

In the noble interests of environmental concern and economy, why not therefore offer overseas members the option of membership without postal distribution of the printed PJ at the same lower £58 rate which currently applies to our non-practising colleagues in Britain? Such a measure would attune well with the non-discriminatory and environmental goals of our society and in this digital age there should be no significant differences in administration costs between UK and overseas members — indeed UK members who now receive the printed PJ at the £58 rate would have much higher administration and postage costs than retired overseas members who simply access PJ Online.

Hopefully such a simple and rational reform can be introduced before fees are set for 2008 to enable retired overseas members to retain membership and contact with our colleagues in the UK without the onus of financial discrimination.

Peter Buckley
Uppsala, Sweden

 

ANN LEWIS, Secretary and Registrar, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, responds:

Online access to the PJ is currently free to anyone, whether members of the Society or not, by going to www.pjonline.com. Although there are plans to restrict access later this year, members will still be able to access it free of charge. There are, however, no plans to reduce the retention fee for overseas members who choose to access the PJ online.


Comparison with nurses

From Mr D. R. Kaye, MRPharmS

I recently discussed the issues of supplementary prescribing with my nursing colleagues. Their disbelief at the requirements for additional training for pharmacists to move from supplementary prescribing to full independent prescribing turned to incredulity at the retention fees being charged. In comparison with pharmacists paying £35 each year to be a supplementary prescriber, nurses pay a one-off fee of £25 for a recordable qualification. For supplementary prescribing this was paid for them by the education provider. I cannot see how the Royal Pharmaceutical Society can justify the annual fee at these levels. If the Society has a role in advancing the pharmacy profession it should be doing everything within its power to encourage professional development and undertaking new roles rather than penalising it. No wonder the nursing profession has adapted more readily to changing roles.

As nursing registration with the Nursing and Midwifery Council costs £43 per annum compared with the Society fee of £318. perhaps it is time that the regulatory side of the Society is separated from the remainder.

David Kaye
Haematology Pharmacist
Christie Hospital
Manchester

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Ethics)
Next Topic (The Society)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal