Home > PJ (current issue) > Broad Spectrum | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7438 p162
10 February 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 50K, Acrobat Reader

Comment

Traditional postgraduate education and training needs a makeover

By Cheryl Davis and Sharon Steel

Cheryl Davis and Sharon Steel are senior pharmaceutical consultants at the Pharmaceutical Resource Network

Over the past 20 years within the hospital sector, pharmacists have successfully demonstrated that they are the experts on medicines and that they can add value to services provided by other health care professionals. With the current drive to move health care services from hospitals into the community, the profession must seize the opportunity to replicate the success of hospital pharmacists and build sufficient capacity to deliver quality clinical pharmacy services in the community. Such services comprise strategic advice to the newly formed practice-based commissioning groups, operational support to GP practices, and advanced and enhanced services within the national community pharmacy contract.

Currently, however, there is only a small number of pharmacists delivering quality clinical pharmacy services in the community.

Anecdotal evidence exists of barriers to delivery of medicines use reviews (MURs) by community pharmacists, despite accreditation, that relate to unmet training needs and a lack, or perceived lack, of skills. Additionally, anecdotal evidence also exists of complaints from GPs about the quality of MURs, including the limited value of them and that community pharmacist recommendations are not evidence-based and conflict with advice from local primary care trust prescribing advisers.

Since 1997, the Pharmaceutical Resource Network has been commissioned to train over 600 health care professionals in 19 primary care organisations to support medicines-related service developments. We have designed and delivered bespoke uniprofessional and multidisciplinary workshop programmes that are specifically focused on the practical application of knowledge and skills in the workplace.

From our experience of training community-based pharmacists, we have identified that they need to undergo a massive and swift change in mindset in order to build on the success of hospital colleagues and gain widespread recognition as being “the experts on medicines” within the primary health care team.

This needs to be addressed both within the training environment and on an ongoing basis within the workplace, to provide hands on support to isolated community pharmacists developing new and changing professional services.

In an earlier Broad spectrum article (PJ, 18 June 2005, p758), one of us (SS) argued that appropriate training content, robust assessment of competence and a mechanism for ongoing support for pharmacist practitioners are all crucial to ensure successful patient outcomes from medication review. We believe that the same is true to ensure the success of MUR services and other clinical services delivered by pharmacists in the community. Hence, reform of pharmacy postgraduate education for community based pharmacists needs to address the content of training, assessment of competence and support networks for community-based pharmacy practitioners.

Content of training

• Content needs to be determined by the competencies required for service provision.

• Training programmes need to be co-ordinated so that they cover all of the competencies required to deliver individual professional services.

• Training programmes need to focus on the practical application of knowledge and skills in the workplace.

• Training materials must be developed and delivered primarily by leading-edge pharmacist practitioners who also have additional expertise in training and a working knowledge of primary care. However, this has implications for accreditation of postgraduate education because such providers are often not affiliated with higher education institutes.

• Training materials must be evidence-based and updated before every face-to-face delivery.

Assessment of competence

• Written and verbal communication skills underpin competence and should be an integral part of competence assessment for clinical practitioners.

• Assessment of competence should include input from service users, including patients and other health care professionals.

• The Objective Structured Clinical Examination should be adapted for use and incorporated more widely into accreditation processes for practitioners to demonstrate their ability to deliver evidence based practice.

Support networks for community based pharmacy practitioners

• There is an urgent need to establish local clinical pharmacy networks to stimulate and support new service delivery in the community and to facilitate sharing of best practice and problem-based learning.

• Such networks should be led by dynamic, motivating, expert practitioners who can act as role models and facilitate professional development.

• There is an urgent need to provide shadowing and coaching opportunities to support isolated practitioners in delivering new professional services.

The success of hospital pharmacists has been underpinned by a career structure and an integrated programme of applied professional development in a supported environment. It is imperative that postgraduate education for community-based pharmacists replicates this in order to deliver practitioners who can demonstrate that they are truly “the experts on medicines” within the primary health care team.

Based on Pharmaceutical Resource Network’s experiences of training hundreds of health care professionals, mainly community pharmacists with unmet training needs, we believe that substantial and rapid reform of postgraduate education for community-based pharmacists is required to achieve the necessary change in the profession. Community-based pharmacists need to be confident and competent to deliver clinical services that meet the needs of the local population. Supporting them to reach their potential in the current NHS environment requires more than just traditional education and training activities.

In our experience, robust assessment of competence and hands-on support in the workplace give pharmacists the confidence to implement what they have learnt, and establish and maintain new clinical services. However, the current arrangements for funding community pharmacist postgraduate education in England leave little room for diversity in meeting pharmacists’ development needs to deliver locally commissioned services. Perhaps it is time for a rethink.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal