Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7438 p154
10 February 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary

Related websites
Community pharmacy contracts


Contract review starts to gather evidence

Anne Galbraith

Anne Galbraith

Pharmacy organisations have started to give evidence to the Department of Health's review of the pharmacy contract (PJ, 27 January, p99).

Anne Galbraith, who intends to complete the review by the end of March, took evidence from the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee, the National Pharmacy Association and the Company Chemists’ Association last week.

The PSNC’s evidence emphasised the strengths of the current contract in supporting high levels of access for patients, with that level of access being dependent on the confidence of businesses to invest in pharmacy premises and staff.

It was the PSNC’s position that all communities, affluent and socially deprived alike, need prescribed medicines to be supplied promptly with advice, support for self care and over-the-counter medicines, along with support for healthy lifestyles.

A special meeting of the PSNC is now to consider questions posed by Mrs Galbraith. The committee will put forward proposals that:

• Offer value for money for the NHS and primary care trusts

• Reduce cost, complexity and administrative burdens on primary care trusts

• Support increased access where services are inadequate

• Develop the value of community pharmacy services for PCTs

• Support Government health priorities

• Support competition and choice

• Restore business confidence

The CCA told Mrs Galbraith that developing the contract through advanced services would be a powerful signal to the NHS that the Government was serious about community pharmacy as a provider of clinical services.

It expressed concern that the NHS did not understand the environment in which private sector businesses, such as pharmacies, invest, saying that pharmacies had invested in good faith on the back of the new contract and that the current direction of travel was right. It wanted to see more competition between different primary care service providers and over enhanced services in particular. The GP contract should include incentives that would encourage repeat dispensing and medicines use reviews, and GPs and pharmacists should be able to communicate electronically. Prevarication over role-based access to patient records for pharmacists should stop.

The NPA told Mrs Galbraith that PCTs needed to make better use of the enhanced services that community pharmacies could offer. The MUR service needed to be linked to the GPs’ quality and outcomes framework, or to some other mechanism that would promote it. There should also be incentives to encourage teamworking with GPs.

It said that controls over the awarding of new pharmacy contracts were needed because without them PCTs would not have the sort of control they needed if they were to commission services effectively.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal