Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7439 p190
17 February 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 90K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• Community pharmacy (3)
• Pfizer proposals
• COPD
• Statins
• Complementary medicine
• NHS
• Physician-assisted suicide (3)
• Prescribing
• Northern Ireland
• Medicines recycling
• Retention fees
• Reciprocity


Letters to the Editor

Retention fees

Trailblazers should not be disadvantaged

From Professor C. A. Mackie, MRPharmS, and others

We would like to add our voice to the many letters and the PJ editorial (13 January, p36) expressing concern on the decision by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society that all qualified independent pharmacist prescribers must pay an annual fee of £35 to renew the independent prescriber annotation to their registration in addition to the one-off administration fee of £35 and their annual retention fee.

Those pharmacists who are undertaking prescribing programmes are trailblazers for the profession and should not be financially disadvantaged in this way. We are concerned that the decision of the Society to pass the administrative cost of maintaining a register to the individual pharmacist could act as a deterrent to other pharmacists who may be interested in undertaking the exciting challenge offered to the profession in the form of independent prescribing.

Like other correspondents we note that the Nursing and Midwifery Council charges new independent nurse prescribers a one-off fee of £25. The Health Professions Council does not charge for the annotation of its members as supplementary prescribers. Readers will also by now know that nurses pay an annual retention fee of £43 and allied health professionals registered with the HPC currently pay £60 a year. Doctors, who pay an annual retention fee of £290 to the General Medical Council, do not pay additional fees for recognition by the GMC of any specialist qualification.

We hope other pharmacists will join us in asking the Society to reconsider the decision to impose this fee as a matter of urgency.

Clare Mackie
Trudy Thomas
Fiona Stephens

Prescribing Programme Teaching Team
Medway School of Pharmacy
Chatham, Kent

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Medicines recycling)
Next Topic (Reciprocity)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal