Home > PJ (current issue) > The Society / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7441 p259
3 March 2007


Society summary


Society starts consultation on self-selection of P medicines

The Royal Pharmaceutical Society has begun a consultation on whether pharmacies should be able to display pharmacy medicines for self-selection by members of the public (see p261).

Unlike the requirement that P medicines should be sold only by or under the supervision of a pharmacist, the current ruling that P medicine should be displayed out of the reach of customers is not a legal necessity but an ethical restriction in the Code of Ethics and Standards. The Society’s Council has for some years been considering relaxing the restriction and in 2001 it allowed a few pharmacies to undertake trials in which P medicines were displayed for self-selection, subject to compliance with guidance developed by the Society. Since then an increasing number of pharmacies have expressed an interest in making pharmacy medicines available for self-selection.

The Society says that a range of views have been expressed about the display of P medicines. Some people believe that self-selection will lead to an increase in inappropriate use and deliberate misuse of P medicines. Others believe that it will increase awareness of the range of P medicines and will enable the public to have greater involvement in their health care. To assess the views of the profession and the public, the Society’s consultation is seeking answers to six specific questions (see Panel below). The responses will be used to develop guidance that reflects respondents’ views.

Consultation questions

• Should there be professional restrictions on the way P medicines are displayed and made accessible to the public?

• If yes, is a complete ban on self-selection of P medicines appropriate?

• Alternatively, should certain types of P medicine be excluded from self-selection?

• If P medicines are available for self-selection, what professional restrictions should exist?

• Instead of making full packs accessible by self-selection, are there other options?

Lynsey Balmer, the Society’s head of professional ethics, says: “The Society is consulting on a number of different issues at the moment, but this important consultation has implications for both the profession and the public. We encourage people to give us their views so that we can develop guidelines that ensure the safe display of and access to pharmacy medicines.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal