We are where we are
We are where we are. This is a phrase much heard in Lambeth at the moment. For better (in many pharmacists’ minds) or worse (in others’), a General Pharmaceutical Council is to be established to register and regulate pharmacists, pharmacy technicians and premises. Although it
may be tempting to look back over the past five or more years to determine
why the Society finds itself in these circumstances, the bottom line
is that regulation is in the gift of the Government and the Society
has always had to be mindful of this.
Many pharmacists see the current state of play as grounds for huge optimism
for the Society: indeed, if it can enthuse members and give them the
professional support and leadership that some of them may believe they
have been lacking, it will be worth the heartache of the past few years.
However, exactly which of the Society’s functions are to be assigned
to the GPC is still open to debate. A News
feature this week (p274) shows
how little detail is yet known about what the GPC will encompass: the
destination of the Registers, the inspectorate and the different statutory
committees as decreed by the Pharmacy and Pharmacy Technicians Order
2007 is clear. RPS Publishing is likely to stay with the professional
body. Where the rest of the Society’s activities end up is less
clear cut and unsettling for those directly involved.
The short term will be challenging for many people, particularly members
of the Society staff, who have had to be nimble in responding to the
demands made on them by successive Councils. They are the unsung heroes
of the story to date. They will, no doubt, continue to serve the profession
as best they can while they find themselves working to a new agenda.
Outside Lambeth there are also challenges to be met. The summary report
prepared by the Society’s policy development division into the
number and status
of support groups within pharmacy revealed the existence
of 188 across Great Britain (PJ, 3 February, p148). It is hard to believe
that pharmacy really needs this number of support groups and tempting
to think that many of them were established because the Society was not
doing what they thought was required. The future may not be clear but
it needs as many of those groups as possible to come into the fold and
give support to the Society’s new mandate.
Back to Top |