Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7443 p308-309
17 March 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 60K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• White Paper (4)
• Funding for services
• Prescription charges
• Community pharmacy (2)
• Pharmacist prescribing
• Chlamydia testing
• Pfizer products
• Medicines recycling
• Skill mix
• Retention fees
• Retail pharmacy


Letters to the Editor

Community pharmacy

A responsive 21st century health care provider (Mr J. Ash)

Time to stop snipping strips of tablets and capsules (Mr J. D. Thomas)

A responsive 21st century health care provider

From Mr J. Ash

I read your leading article, “Hopes for the high street” (PJ, 17 February, p177), with interest. We concur wholeheartedly with your premise that the time is ripe for community pharmacy to realise its clinical potential and prove that it is “more than just a retailer”. As you concluded, it will need to go hand in hand with the financing of clinical pharmacy services. There is, therefore, a challenge for both pharmacy and the NHS.

Lloydspharmacy trusts that the new review of control of entry will provide part of the answer to this and that the Department of Health will directly address some of the issues that you highlight. For example, offering more dedicated funding for pharmacy services, and allowing competition between all primary care providers based on a common primary care trust contract for services, from GP to pharmacist. Such opportunities should be compelling to both independent pharmacy and the larger groups.

Furthermore, we believe that patient-focused care is best delivered by bringing together a range of health care organisations to focus on, and respond to, a community’s specific health care needs. Delivering joined-up, practical and easy-to-access health care, particularly in areas of under-provision or of high health inequality, is the future for primary care in general, and especially for pharmacy.

Lloydspharmacy may be a major multiple, but we face the same space constraints as the smaller operators to which you refer. We have taken the leap of faith in the vast majority of our pharmacies, removed many of the “hair products and tights” and focused our attention, and our staff’s time, on clinical and diagnostic services. The transition is indeed difficult but the rewards for our people, our patients and our business are now being seen.

When this change is achieved throughout UK pharmacy, with rapidly improving patient outcomes, we will all wonder why we ever thought the best way to meet customer needs was to stock hairclips and 35mm film.

Justin Ash
Managing Director
Lloyds Pharmacy Ltd


Time to stop snipping strips of tablets and capsules

From Mr J. D. Thomas, MRPharmS

I am sure that pharmacy contractors will be disturbed and dismayed by the increasing numbers of Statutory Committee decisions in which pharmacists have been either reprimanded or had their names removed from the Register for “having the presence in their dispensaries, manufacturers’ boxes containing strips of tablets and capsules, some of which had no batch numbers and expiry dates” (PJ, 3 March, p265).

It is without doubt that every registered pharmacy premises will be guilty of this offence since it is an integral part of the pharmacy NHS contract that the exact quantity that is prescribed must be supplied, except in the case of products supplied in special containers. As a result, community pharmacists have become professional snippers of manufacturers’ original strips of tablets and capsules.

Manufacturers’ strips have only one set of batch numbers and expiry date. By snipping off the exact prescription amount, only one of these two sections of the strip will contain these two pieces of information, while the other will have no identification. In some cases, a single tablet or capsule may not even have its product name visible.

Surely, now is the time for this anomaly to be eradicated by the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee, acting as its name implies, to ensure that pharmacy contractors can dispense and be remunerated for entire and uncut strips, since it is now clear from these Statutory Committee decisions that it is unprofessional to cut strips and we must now exert our professional duty to safeguard the public.

The PSNC must grasp this chance to excel, but if it procrastinates then once our Royal Pharmaceutical Society has been split into two, perhaps the professional “royal college” body can act professionally on community pharmacy’s behalf.

David Thomas
Patshull, Shropshire

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Prescription charges)
Next Topic (Pharmacist prescribing)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal