Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7447 p415
14 April 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


OFT decides to scrutinise UK medicines distribution

Distribution of medicines in the UK and, in particular, the direct-to-pharmacy model being increasingly pursued by manufacturers will be scrutinised by the Office of Fair Trading, the consumer watchdog announced last week.

The OFT said last year (PJ, 28 October 2006, p507) that it was looking into whether to investigate the fairness of Pfizer’s then-proposed exclusive distribution deal with UniChem after it received a series of complaints, but no decision had been made by the time Pfizer’s scheme went live on 5 March.

Rather than launching a full investigation into the Pfizer/UniChem arrangement, the OFT has opted to undertake a “market study” looking at the overall effects of recent and proposed changes on medicines distribution (see Panel below). The OFT says that a short market study will enable it to ensure that any concerns it identifies are tackled effectively and proportionately.

OFT short market study

The OFT says it intends to examine:

• Motivation for the direct-to-pharmacy model and its impact on competition and choice in wholesaling

• Motivation for exclusive arrangements and their long-term impact on competition

• Incentives created by sector-specific regulations

• Potential impact of the different distribution models on the appropriation of the discounts secured by pharmacies and the NHS, and service levels provided to patients

The OFT will consider how changes in the pharmaceutical distribution market are influenced by sector specific regulations, parallel trade and counterfeit products. The office has identified several possible outcomes of the study:

• Giving the sector a clean bill of health
• Making a referral to the Competition Commission
• Undertaking a full investigation under the Competition Act
• Making recommendations to the Government

The OFT invites submissions relevant to the study by 1 June 2007; further information is available from the OFT website

The National Pharmacy Association said it was pleased that the study will use patient care as its prime focus.

Colette McCreedy, director of pharmacy practice at the NPA, commented: “It’s important that the impact of Pfizer’s decision, and the domino effect if other manufacturers follow suit, is looked at in the context of the ‘fair funding’ principle for NHS pharmacy services. If left unchecked, this coupled with the impact on timely supply of medicines to pharmacies could have a detrimental effect on patient care.”

Pfizer reacted to the news: “Pfizer is pleased to note that the OFT has not launched a formal investigation into Pfizer’s medicine supply and distribution arrangement at this time and we will continue to sell our medicines directly to pharmacy customers using UniChem as our logistics service provider.” The manufacturer said that it would co-operate fully with the OFT.

British Association of Pharmaceutical Wholesalers executive director Martin Sawer reiterated the BAPW’s concerns that new distribution arrangements “could damage the robustness of the pharmaceutical supply chain and the ability of patients to receive medicines quickly and easily, with the potential for hidden costs to the NHS”.

He declared: “Now is the time for the pharmacy sector to come together to explain clearly the effects of these new arrangements on their services and their patients.”

In support of the OFT study, Scottish Pharmaceutical General Council chief executive officer Harry McQuillan said: “SPGC has argued from the beginning that any move to single channel distribution through one wholesaler would have a detrimental impact on the stability of the current distribution network and the delivery of pharmaceutical care to patients. It is vital that the likely impact of such fundamental changes on Scotland’s patients, the distribution network and the NHS in Scotland is fully understood”.

Mark Stephenson, supplier relations director, UniChem, told The Journal that he welcomed “the clarity that a market study will bring”.

However, Sue Sharpe, chief executive at the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee, pointed out that the OFT market study would not resolve any immediate problems. “[It] will not be completed until the end of the year, and any action resulting from the study would not be expected for several months after that,” she said. “Changes in distribution arrangements that have been implemented by Pfizer will continue, and other manufacturers may well proceed with their plans to introduce new systems for supplying the market.”

Mrs Sharpe added: “There is already concern about growing numbers of medicines that cannot be purchased by pharmacies at or below the net reimbursement price, and although the funding arrangements ensure that, overall, pharmacies secure the agreed levels of purchase profits, for individual pharmacies this can be damaging.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal