Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7448 p460
21 April 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 70K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• White Paper (5)
• Pseudoephedrine (2)
• Eczema
• Chemotherapy
• Community pharmacy (2)
• Locum pharmacy
• Packaging
• Dispensing
• MDS
• Parallel imports
• Prescription charges
• The Society
• Skill mix
• Professionalism
• Boots travel insurance


Letters to the Editor

Boots travel insurance

We who use Boots medicines should expect some consideration

From Mr N. Evans, MRPharmS

I wonder whether Boots The Chemists is truly a health care company? Despite being normotensive with a cholesterol level of 4.3mmol/L, thanks to amlodipine and simvastatin, I have been refused travel insurance by Boots.

My level of cardiovascular risk is well below that recognised in most guidelines of 20 per cent over the next 10 years, but I have been unable to obtain an explanation from the company or its actuaries of the level of risk they are willing to accept. Perhaps they are only willing to accept premiums from those unlikely to make a claim.

I recognise that it is not a charity, but if we are to benefit from the medicines dispensed by Boots we should expect some consideration other than blank refusal.

Insurance companies need to be informed of the beneficial outcomes of modern medicines.

Norman Evans
East Molesey, Surrey

 

KEVIN JOHNSON, general manager, Boots Insurance Services, responds:

Boots’s travel insurance has been designed to ensure that all our customers have full medical cover while they are abroad, including cover for pre-existing conditions.

We have worked hard to include as many pre-existing conditions as possible within our standard policy, so for example people with well controlled asthma can get full cover for their condition at the standard price.

Although we are unable to comment specifically on an individual basis, in line with other insurers, applications are assessed and based on a customer’s medical condition and are not based on cardiovascular risk prediction charts. Where there is a combination of certain medical conditions we are unable to provide cover on our standard policy.

Where we are unable to offer our standard product, we refer our customers to a different policy where the condition will be covered for an additional charge.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Professionalism)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal