Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7452 p586
19 May 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 50K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• White paper (5)
• Dispensing errors
• Insect bites and stings
• Community contract
• Locum pharmacy
• Pseudoephedrine
• The Journal (2)


Letters to the Editor

Pseudoephedrine

No need for switch

From Mr C. London, MRPharmS

I would like to make a comment about the proposal to change pseudoephedrine to a prescription only medicine.

In New Zealand (where I live) we have one of the world’s worst problems with regard to illegal conversion of pseudoephedrine, but the vast majority of raw material does not come from over-the-counter purchases of pseudoephedrine. Some does come from retail — from burglaries — and there are still “pseudo-shoppers” (as the police call them) but most comes from illegal imports and internet purchases.

We do have one small advantage in that we have an extra category of medicines in addition to “pharmacy only”. This is a “pharmacist only” medicine that must be sold personally by the pharmacist and records of the purchaser must be kept which, if appropriate, can be passed onto the police. Pseudoephedrine is not actually in this category, yet, but most pharmacies treat it as if it is, keeping records and requiring photo identification for purchase. I understand that in Australia these records are sent direct to a central database by broadband internet connection. This means that if a person buys a pseudoephedrine product in one pharmacy, when he goes down the road to try to purchase another the pharmacist will know that he has already bought one that day.

I fail to see how making pseudoephedrine a prescription-only medicine would make any difference to the problem if OTC purchase is not the principle source and that does not take account of the vast waste of resources caused by sending everyone with a bit of nasal congestion to the doctor.

Perhaps it is time that the regulatory authorities had a bit more faith in the abilities of pharmacists to supervise the purchase of medicines properly, as the vast majority have done for many years.

Chris London
Milton, New Zealand

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Locum pharmacy)
Next Topic (The Journal)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal