Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7455 p661
9 June 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Pfizer purchasing quotas criticised by CPS

Some community pharmacy contractors have had limits set by Pfizer on the amount they can order of certain products, according to Community Pharmacy Scotland in its submission to the Office of Fair Trading's market study into UK medicines distribution. This issue has also been highlighed by the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee (PJ, 2 June, p637).

Pfizer confirmed the practice and defended its system, which, it says, prevents contractors ordering “excessive amounts”.

According to CPS, some contractors have received letters from Pfizer saying that they had ordered too many packs of a particular medicine, over a limit that Pfizer had now set, and were unable to order any more until a later date. Pharmacists who tried to order more product received no stock and the invoice from UniChem stated “Pfizer no right to buy” or “restricted supply”, CPS writes.

David Watson, head of trade, Pfizer, told The Journal: “It is essential for us to manage the supply of our products, basically so that we can always make sure we have got enough products to sell. … If we see very unusual ordering patterns on certain products, then from time to time we have written to pharmacists.”

He said that Pfizer had set order limits in around 39 cases across the UK during the first three months of its new supply arrangements. “Where we have done that is where we think we would have supply issues locally unless we took some action,” Mr Watson claimed. He added that most UK wholesalers operate a similar monitoring process.

In its submission to the OFT, CPS also voices its disappointment that Pfizer “set national rates of discount for its distribution scheme without reference to or discussion with [CPS]”, which the group says indicated the company’s “lack of knowledge of the different discount recovery rates and mechanisms that exist in Scotland compared to those in place in England”.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal