Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7456 p705
16 June 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 50K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• White Paper (2)
• Liberal professions
• Pseudoephedrine
• Substance misuse (2)
• MDS (2)
• Counterfeit medicines
• NHS
• Women in pharmacy
• Technicians (2)
• Retention fees
• The Journal (2)


Letters to the Editor

Counterfeit medicines

Was it necessary to issue a class 1 recall?

From Mr R. D. Miles, MRPharmS

The recall of counterfeit bicalutamide 50mg (PJ, 9 June, p668) meant that a well-practised procedure had to be initiated in every pharmacy. Records had to be checked, stock examined and wards and patients contacted. This is all done efficiently but is disruptive to a busy pharmacy. However, had the fax come through a few hours later the consequences would have been far more serious: pharmacists called out of bed to cascade the notice, ward activity disrupted to check stock, patients frightened. And for what purpose?

A counterfeit product containing 75 per cent active ingredient had entered the supply chain, but did it pose an immediate threat to life such as the consequences of an unsterile injection, a tablet contaminated by penicillin, or an inactive resuscitation drug? I think not. There was no statement that the batch did contain harmful contaminants. So why the status of class 1 — “action immediately including out of hours”?

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency had, rightly, undertaken some laboratory work and initial investigations. It also provided an excellent question-and-answer sheet to help us deal with the situation. This must have taken time, so why the extreme urgency with the alert?

A cynic might conclude that any loss of confidence in parallel imported products can only benefit the large pharmaceutical companies, which pay most in fees to the MHRA.

Counterfeit products are a threat to patient care and the MHRA, as a custodian of public safety, is right to take a strong stand against them, but is a class 1 recall justified when life is not threatened? I have my doubts.

Roger Miles
Regional Specialist Procurement Pharmacist (NW)
Royal Bolton Hospital

 

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency declined our invitation to respond to this letter.
EDITOR

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Monitored dosage systems)
Next Topic (National Health Service)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal