Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7456 p693
16 June 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Society sets timetable for consultation with membership over future

How the Royal Pharmaceutical Society plans to engage with its members over the next six months about a future professional body has now been outlined.

An independent chairman will be appointed by the Society as soon as possible to elicit the views of members and key stakeholder groups on the role of a professional body, said the Society’s President Hemant Patel at a press briefing last week.

The independent chairman will not have any connections with pharmacy, will be of sufficiently high standing in society and will be recognised as an authoritative voice by members, the Government and other bodies, he said. The chairman will be supported by a secretariat and will take written and oral submissions from pharmacy organisations and individuals.

The Society also plans to commission research into members’ views about a professional body through a tender process later this month. The research is intended to identify key themes and issues surrounding the needs, wants and expectations of the profession and the role of a professional body. It is likely to take on board the views of a random sample of pharmacists.

“There are potentially at least 47,000 views and to try to get a consensus is not going to be easy. But there are already some clear themes emerging and I want to be confident that we have done all we can to understand not [just] what [the members] want but why they want it,” said Mr Patel. There will be an update on the research at the British Pharmaceutical Conference in September and the full results, which will feed into the independent review, will be published in late autumn.

A formal consultation with individual members will start around the turn of the year after the Society and the members have had time to digest the findings from both the independent review and the commissioned research, said Mr Patel.

The Society is also writing to the Department of Health to raise concerns over the cost of the split, the financial viability of a future professional body and the resources available within the Government and the regulators to support implementation of the regulation White Paper.

“Only three years ago, the Government encouraged the Society to have an integrated role and now it has changed its mind. We accept the need to ask for a separation … but it must financially support the split,” said Mr Patel. “We were led down the garden path by the Government. It gave us a new Charter. It cannot walk away from that,” he added.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal