Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7457 p729
23 June 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary

Related websites
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)


Wash-out unnecessary before starting abatacept

Science Photo Library

Arthritic hand

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis who fail on anti-TNF therapy may benefit from a second or third biologic

Rheumatoid arthritis patients who do not respond to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors do not need a wash-out period before starting abatacept (Orencia), according to data presented last week at the annual congress of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) in Barcelona.

The new study assessed abatacept safety in 842 patients who started taking it after inadequate response to an anti-TNF. Of these, 370 were classed as “prior” users as they had stopped the therapy at least two months before entering the study. The remaining 472 “current” users had received an anti-TNF within two months of starting abatacept.

After six months, the frequency of adverse events, serious adverse events, infections, neoplasms and deaths was similar in both groups.

Abatacept was launched in the UK last week but has been available in the US for about a year. Most other biologic therapies used to treat rheumatoid arthritis are TNF inhibitors but abatacept works by selectively inhibiting T-cell activation.

Michael Schiff, of the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Denver, said: “It’s become a common question: how long do we have to wait before starting abatacept? But these data are encouraging and suggest we don’t have to wait for a wash-out period.”

Anthony Hammond, consultant rheumatologist at Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, was a UK investigator for the abatacept trial. He said: “We’ve seen good results with this drug. And remember that these are patients with serious rheumatic disease who have failed on both methotrexate and anti-TNFs, so it’s a welcome addition.”

The results were presented days after the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence agreed to review its decision not to recommend trying a second anti-TNF therapy following poor response to a first.

Dr Hammond welcomed the decision and added: “Latest data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register show that many patients derive benefit from a second and even a third biologic.

“If you take money out of the equation cycling biologics is certainly worthwhile.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal