Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 278 No 7458 p761
30 June 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Primary care pharmacist job losses to be quantified

Primary care pharmacists will find out later this summer how many of their jobs have disappeared because of recent budget cuts and NHS reorganisation.

The Primary Care Pharmacists’ Association announced this week that it is surveying members in England to discover the effect on posts of wiping out the last financial year’s NHS deficit and the merger of primary care trusts. The PCPA intends to telephone as many PCTs as possible in July and expects the results to be known by the end of the summer.

The Pharmaceutical Advisors Group in England and Wales, representing PCT pharmaceutical advisers, is also questioning its members about the impact of PCT reorganisation, introduced last October. It wants to find out how departments are now organised and whether PCTs are continuing to employ pharmaceutical advisers. A questionnaire has gone to the group’s regional representatives, who are being asked to pass it on to individual PCT members.

At the same time, the Guild of Healthcare Pharmacists, which represents mostly hospital pharmacists, wants to find out how many jobs have disappeared in NHS trusts between 2006 and 2007 or have been frozen because of a combination of Agenda for Change and budget cuts.

Shailen Rao

Shailen Rao: PCPA to survey members

Shailen Rao, PCPA chairman, said: “Whether [primary care] jobs have gone because of the cuts or [through] PCT reorganisation doesn’t really matter, but [we need] to find out where this has been happening. Our members are crying out to find out what’s happening elsewhere in the country.”

Helen Chadwick, PAG secretary and deputy chief pharmacist at Milton Keynes PCT, said: “We want to discover where people are now and what the set up is. We want to discover whether there are any gaps and whether PCTs are employing advisers and support staff.”

President of the guild Anthony Oxley said morale across the NHS was low because of the cuts and reorganisation. He said: “Every profession in the health service feels bruised at the moment — I think morale has been sapped across the board.

“It’s going to be quite difficult to get a figure for the number of pharmacy job losses, but it is something we are working on at a regional level.”

The latest annual hospital pharmacist recruitment survey, covering the whole of the UK, for the first time asked pharmacists to identify how many posts they thought were under threat in the previous 12 months. The question was added in the hope that the answers would reveal whether the regrading of posts brought in by Agenda for Change had resulted in job losses.

The results of the survey, carried out in May 2006, revealed that 2 per cent of hospital jobs (122 pharmacist posts) were thought to be under threat at that time. But since the figure only reflected anticipated job losses brought about by Agenda for Change and not direct budget cuts to balance the NHS books, the true number could be much higher, according to David Scott, from John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford, who carried out the survey.


Recruitment feature p765

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal