Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 279 No 7459 p3
7 July 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Call to improve monitoring of CD requisition forms

Both the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and the National Pharmacy Association have called on the Home Office to introduce standardised serial numbered requisition forms for Controlled Drugs to improve monitoring of the circulation of CDs.

But responding to a Home Office consultation (PJ, 26 May, p599), the two organisations take the view that plans to require NHS pharmacy contractors to send copies of CD requisitions to NHS pricing offices, along with all CD prescriptions, do not go far enough to allow effective monitoring.

The Society’s response (PDF 20K) says that the forms should be numbered serially to increase traceability and control over requisitions. But warning that the system will be incomplete because pharmacies order CDs electronically from wholesalers, the Society adds that requiring paper requisitions for orders from wholesalers would go against the interest of patients, since same day or next day supplies were often needed. It also points out that wholesalers will not be expected to supply the NHS with details of CD requisitions, making the audit trail even more incomplete.

For the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee, Stephen Lutener (head of regulation) said that sending requisitions to pricing offices would be a burden on pharmacy contractors, but that it was justifiable to tighten the audit trail. However, he warned that the trail would be incomplete, since requisitions from out-of-hours centres, and any other organisation that obtained supplies from hospital pharmacies, fell outside the scope of the proposed requirement.

All three organisations support proposals to abolish fixed-format CD registers, but the NPA says that January 2008 is too soon for the change.

The NPA said that changing the rules will allow more information to be recorded and that removing the requirement for registers to be in a set format will make it easier to create a complete audit trail for CDs. But the association added that this is a major change to the way pharmacists record CD transactions and that more time should be allowed to manage the change.

Although not integral to the formal consultation, the Home Office also sought views on the possibility that CD prescriptions could be written and transmitted electronically.

Again, all three organisations supported the
suggestion, but two of them also expressed reservations.
The Society says that it would support the plan once IT systems were sufficiently secure and once electronic transmission of non-CD prescriptions was widespread.

The NPA warned that patients’ ability to get urgently needed CDs could be put at risk by ETP because patients who asked for their electronic prescriptions to be sent to a specific pharmacy without also taking a paper token would be unable to get what they needed from another pharmacy if the nominated pharmacy were out of stock.

The PSNC said that regulations to allow ETP for CD prescriptions should be introduced as soon as possible.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal