Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 279 No 7460 p38
14 July 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Course extension briefly threatened SoP viability

London University's School of Pharmacy was secretly placed on a list of academic institutions under serious financial risk in the late 1990s when the pharmacy degree was being extended from three to four years.

The list was drawn up by the Higher Education Funding Council for England and obtained by The Guardian under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

School of Pharmacy dean Anthony Smith said: “The school only learnt two weeks ago that in the late 1990s it had been placed on an ‘at risk’ list by the funding council.”

Professor Smith added that the School of Pharmacy was only on the list temporarily in the transition from the three-year BPharm degree to the four-year MPharm degree. Financial projections at the time showed that the school had to support a third more students before the HEFC confirmed the additional funding to support them. “Once confirmed, the school’s financial predictions showed excellent health to match its outstanding academic health,” Professor Smith said.

Adding a year to the undergraduate pharmacy degree would have made the School of Pharmacy’s finances look insecure at the time because it was an independent institution deriving a large proportion of its HEFC funding for just one course.

Other institutions included on the HEFC’s at-risk list included De Montfort University and Liverpool John Moores University, both of which offer pharmacy degrees among a wide range of other courses.

In 2000, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society withheld accreditation of the pharmacy course at Liverpool John Moores University because of concerns over the curriculum and the resources the university had made available for its delivery (PJ, 12 August 2000, p218).

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal