Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 279 No 7461 p63
21 July 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Company chemists reject emphasis in APPG report

Pressure from the All-Party Pharmacy Group for the community pharmacy sector to focus on health, rather than retailing, has been rejected by the Company Chemists' Association.

In a written response to the APPG’s recent report on the future of community pharmacy (PJ, 30 June, p757 and p763) the association said that CCA member companies would reject any policy that allowed the Government to dictate how they develop their businesses.

“Government can influence the direction of travel of community pharmacy very effectively by creating the right incentive framework — the nationally commissioned contract is clearly the most powerful tool,” it said.

“However, consumer preferences are also important and the consumer will always be central to our members’ decision making.”

Commenting on the perceived tension between the professional and commercial roles in community pharmacy, the response says that the CCA is perplexed by the report’s focus on this as a barrier. It points out that there is general acceptance that the private sector will play an increasing role in the provision of primary health care and that family doctors are highly motivated by financial incentives.

“While community pharmacy is currently the primary care contractor profession with the most diverse range of business models, general practice is changing rapidly, with private sector providers entering the market. … Community pharmacy is no longer the exception to the rule.”

However, the CCA agrees with the APPG that community pharmacy needs to be developed through nationally recognised advanced services.

“[The CCA] believes that the new pharmacy contract was predicated on a shared understanding between NHS employers, Department of Health and contractors, represented by the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee, that advanced services would be the primary mechanism used to develop pharmacy services and the pharmacy contract,” it said.

PSNC view Following its July 2007 meeting, the PSNC said in a statement:

“The committee was pleased that the [APPG] proposals follow the PSNC’s current policies and priority service development areas. Work will be undertaken to explore further recommendations that have not been considered; these include the recommendations about local level representation and the proposed QOF approach. PSNC will develop proposals for how quality might be rewarded.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal