Society seeks members' views in consultation on fees increase
The Royal Pharmaceutical Society has begun a 60-day consultation on the proposals made at the July 2007 meeting of the Council to increase
the fees payable to the Society for 2008 (PJ, 4 August, p129).
Under the Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians Order 2007, the way in
which the Society sets its fees has changed. Under previous legislation,
changes to the fees were proposed by the Council and gazetted in The
Pharmaceutical Journal. Permission was then sought from the Privy Council
to make changes to fees by an amendment to the Society’s Byelaws.
The ability of registrants to influence the decisions about fees was
limited, the Society says.
Under the new Order, the Council now has a duty to consult those registered
with the Society in respect of the registration and retention fees it
charges.

The Treasurer: greater transparency, accountability and understanding |
Andrew Gush, the Society’s Treasurer, said: “The Council
has been faced with some tough financial decisions and I hope that this
consultation will help the membership to understand why fee changes are
necessary at this crucial time for the Society.
“This process will bring greater transparency, accountability and understanding
to the fee-setting process. At the end of the consultation period, all
responses received will be analysed by an independent external body,
and the findings presented to the Council at its October 2007 meeting.
The Council will publish a report on the findings and any final decisions
it takes about the fees, which will be made available on the Society’s
website and in The Pharmaceutical Journal.”
Participants in the consultation are invited to answer and comment on
10 questions (see Panel).
In a foreword to the consultation documents, the President, Hemant Patel,
describes the external factors that have driven in the increases in fees
as:
• The increased costs of regulation arising from the Pharmacists and
Pharmacy Technicians Order 2007
• The deficit in the Society’s final salary pension fund
• Recent changes to tax regulations
• The costs of the Government’s plan to split the Society into
a new regulatory body and professional body
The consultation documents describe the nine principles that the Council
took into consideration when setting fees. They were:
• Maintaining resources to a level appropriate for sound business operation
• Maintaining financial independence
• Using publishing income to build reserves
• Encouraging professional innovators
• Applying the fee structure to all registrants proportionately
• Recovering administrative costs
• Maintaining a three-year rolling budget
• Ensuring fees are simple to understand and transparent
• Minimising the costs of fees collection and administration for payers
and the Society
Further information about these principles is given in the documents.
The consultation
documents are available on the Society’s website and also in
hard copy on application to the Secretary and Registrar’s Office, 1 Lambeth
High Street, London SE1 7JN (tel 020 7572 2201/2202). Responses to the
consultation (which can be completed and sent via the website) are invited
by Wednesday 3 October 2007.
Consultation questions
1. Are the principles defined in the consultation document clear?
2. Do you agree with the principles identified for fee setting?
3. Are there any additional principles that are missing or ones that
should be removed?
4. Do you agree with the way the principles have been applied?
5. If you do not agree with the principles as they have been applied,
how should they be applied differently?
6. Are you content with the overall approach outlined in the consultation
documents in relation to fee setting?
7. Are you content with current fee year, January to December?
8. If you are not content with the current fee year, January to December,
would you prefer April to March, but with a pro rata increase to
the 2008 fee to align the timetable?
9. Do you agree that the Society should identify ways to reduce overheads,
increase income and plan improved membership communications and membership
services over the next three years?
10. Given the increase costs arising from the Pharmacy and Pharmacy
Technicians Order 2007, the deficit in the Society’s final
salary pension fund and the costs of the Government plans to demerge
the Society into a new regulatory body and a professional body, is
it your view that the increases in fees outlined in the consultation
document are justified? |
|