The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 279 No 7469 p293
15 September 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 70K, Acrobat Reader

• The profession (3)
• NPC (3)
• Community pharmacy
• Prescription pricing
• Wholesaling
• Anticoagulation
• Dispensing
• The Society (3)
• Regulation
• Fees consultation (2)
• Retention fees (2)
• Listening friends
• The Journal

Letters to the Editor

The Journal

Unsatisfactory explanation

From Mr R. J. Woodhouse, MRPharmS

I agree with Anthony Cox (PJ, 1 September, p233) that your reason for not publishing the website address of the membership fee petition (because you wanted to encourage participation in an official consultation) is unsatisfactory.

How does participating in a website petition prevent any Royal Pharmaceutical Society member from participating in an official consultation?

Roger J. Woodhouse
Bath

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Listening friends)