Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 279 No 7469 p281
15 September 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Statin switch debate reopened after new study data

Changing patients from atorvastatin to simvastatin raises the risk of death or major cardiovascular event by a third according to a Pfizer study presented at the European Society of Cardiology conference in Vienna last week.

The study — which has been reported widely in the national media — has reopened the row over statin switching.

Researchers examined data from a primary care database of 4.77 million patients, including 2,511 patients who had been switched, and compared the switch patients with 9,009 unswitched controls who continued to receive atorvastatin.

Compared with controls, switched patients had a 43 per cent increased risk of major cardiovascular events (P=0.008) and a 114 per cent increased risk of stroke (P=0.009). A 30 per cent greater risk of the combined end point of all-cause death or major cardiovascular event was observed for switched patients compared with controls (P=0.03).

Berkeley Phillips, cardiovascular category medical manager at Pfizer UK and one of the researchers, said: “This study provides further evidence that patients should be switched only on a case-by-case basis, and raises questions against switching as a matter of policy.”

But Magnus Hird, pharmacist practitioner at the Bloomfield Medical Centre in Blackpool, said: “It’s important to point out that this was an observational study and only suitable for generating a hypothesis. There is no information on why the switches were carried out, what doses patients were switched from and to, and all the data were from before June 2005 when patients would be far less likely to have been switched to equivalent simvastatin doses.”

He added that 28.2 per cent of the switched cohort had diabetes compared with 26.3 per cent of those who stayed on atorvastatin and an additional 0.5 per cent in the switched cohort had angina and previous stroke or myocardial infarction. “These differences might be small on their own but they could add up to affect the outcome,” said Mr Hird.

Encouraging GPs to switch hyperlipidaemic patients from relatively expensive statins, such as atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, to simvastatin has been a major plank of primary care trusts’ prescribing policy.

Cardiovascular lead for Medway PCT and member of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence lipid modification guideline group Rubin Minhas said: “This is a poor quality study susceptible to confounding and bias selection. Switching between equivalent doses of statins is safe, effective and an efficient use of scarce resources.”

A UK hospital audit published in April compared periods before and after switching and found mortality was 5 per cent in patients on atorvastatin but 14 per cent with simvastatin — but its methodology was similarly criticised.

Chairman of the Primary Care Cardiovascular Society Terry McCormack criticised newspaper reports of the new study, which failed to report its funding source or its limitations, saying: “This will have caused false and unnecessary anxiety among thousands of patients who have quite safely switched their statins.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal