Home > PJ (current issue) > The Society / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 279 No 7470 p333-334
22 September 2007


Society summary

Practice-based commissioning


Securing pharmacy's place in the new world of practice-based commissioning

In this article, Heidi Wright, from the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's Practive and Quality Improvement Directorate, Barbara Parsons, from the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee, and Trish O'Gorman, from the Improvement Foundation, describe how practice-based commissioning allows pharmacists to become more involved in service planning and delivery

Pharmacy practice-based commissioning week — 24 to 28 September 2007

Practice-based commissioning week is an awareness-raising initiative to help pharmacy become engaged in the PBC process. It is hoped that the initiative, which is being supported by a number of pharmacy bodies in England, will help provide the focus and the impetus for engagement with PBC to take root.

Further information about pharmacy PBC awareness week

PBC is about providing services that patients need

PBC is about providing services that patients need

SUMMARY

The introduction of practice-based commissioning (PBC), together with the implementation of the new community pharmacy contract, provides the opportunity for pharmacists in England to become more involved in the planning and delivery of services.

If PBC is to achieve its full potential in delivering high quality care to patients and provide value for money, then all health care teams should be integrated into the PBC process of planning, redesigning and delivery of services.

Identification of local health needs, together with a more diverse provision of care, can be achieved by adopting a multidisciplinary approach to PBC. This collaborative working between pharmacy, GPs and primary care trusts will increase capacity to meet demand and create innovative care pathways that best use the skills available in both general practice and pharmacy to their full potential.

PBC is now starting to become established so pharmacy as a whole needs to think about how it can contribute to and become involved in this process. PBC is not just a commissioning route for community pharmacy; it also affects pharmacists working in partnership with primary care who provide medicines management and medicine review services, as well as those working in secondary care who may wish to provide outreach clinics. Examples of pharmacist involvement in care pathways and service redesign are shown in the Panel (below).

Full text article (PDF 60K)

Examples of pharmacist involvement in care pathways and service redesign

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Claremont practice in Devon employs a community pharmacist for one day a week to work with patients who have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Through domiciliary visits for the severe housebound patients, medication reviews, running COPD clinics and reviewing the COPD register, major savings have been achieved for the practice as well as better outcomes for patients.

Diagnostic services
In Derwentside PCT community pharmacists are providing international normalised ratio measurement services in community pharmacy-based clinics or in patients’ homes. This has led to a reduction in ambulance transport costs, an increase in accessibility and capacity of this service and enables all practices to have access to community based anticoagulant monitoring (a PCT target).

Medicines management
In-depth assessment is used to develop tailored medicines management solutions for vulnerable older people living in the community in Poole. Pharmacists and pharmacy technicians provide intensive support for patients, developing pharmaceutical care plans that enable patients to administer their own highly complex medical treatments safely.

The service works closely with secondary care to improve the patient experience after discharge and is linked through a service level agreement with local community pharmacies to provide an enhanced pharmacy service. Specialist nurses, GP practices and social care services are also involved.

Long-term conditions
A practice in Exmouth has employed a pharmacist for one day a week to review certain patients with long-term conditions. Over a period of a year the contribution of the pharmacist has resulted in an estimated £4,566 being saved on the prescribing budget.

Medicine use reviews
Medicine use review is an advanced service under the contractual framework for community pharmacists. In Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, community pharmacists have been requested to use MURs to target patients currently on osteoporosis agents.

The pharmacist checks that the patient is adherent to the regimen and discusses intake of calcium via diet or adjunct therapy. The MUR also includes a falls risk assessment. This service has led to an improvement in access, particularly for hard to reach at risk patients, and improvements in adherence and in calcium and vitamin D3 intake. This, in turn, has led to a reduction in falls and a reduction in emergency admissions and secondary care costs.

Cost minimisation and medicine management in nursing homes
In Havering PCT a service has been designed to minimise drug wastage for nursing home residents through application of an agreed prescribing policy and structured medicine reviews by a community pharmacist. The pharmacist identifies clinical and clerical prescribing issues for resident patients, which are then put to the GP for action.

This service supports the National Service Framework for Older People and has resulted in a reduction in the number of unnecessary medicines that elderly patients take, an improved quality of life for residents, a reduction in side effects requiring admission to hospital, a reduction in falls, a reduction in overall treatment costs and a use of savings in part-time GP recruitment to look after nursing home patients.

The service has resulted in a 60 per cent reduction in prescribing costs and on average the work of the pharmacist resulted in 4.5 recommendations (3 clinical, 1.45 clerical) per patient. Of these, one in every three clinical recommendations led to a discontinuation of medication and one in every 1.5 clerical recommendation led to removal of unwanted medicines from the patient’s record.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal