Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 279 No 7471 p339
29 September 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Doubts cast over benefit of flu jabs for elderly people

Alain Dex, Publiphoto Diffusion/Science Photo Library

Flu immunisation

Flu immunisation may save fewer lives than expected

As the annual influenza immunisation campaigns kick off in Britain next week, evidence for the benefits of vaccinating elderly people against flu is questioned in a review article published online in Lancet Infectious Diseases (24 September 2007).

Lone Simonsen, of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland, and colleagues argue that frailty selection bias and non-specific endpoints, such as all-cause mortality, in cohort studies have led to greatly inflated estimates of how well vaccination protects elderly people from flu-related death.

The remaining evidence, they say, is not sufficient to indicate the magnitude of the mortality benefit, if any, that elderly people derive from the vaccination programme.

“Although placebo-controlled randomised trials show influenza vaccine is effective in younger adults, few trials have included elderly people, and especially those aged at least 70 years, the age group that accounts for three-quarters of all influenza-related deaths [in the US],” say the researchers.

They point out that flu vaccines cannot prevent 50 per cent of all winter deaths in elderly people, as claimed in cohort studies, since the estimated burden of excess deaths related to flu is 5 per cent per year in the US. “That influenza vaccination can prevent 10 times as many deaths as the disease itself causes is not plausible,” they say.

The researchers highlight studies that suggest vaccine effectiveness declines sharply after the age of 70 years and that antibody responses to flu vaccine in elderly people are only about one-quarter to one-half as strong as those in younger adults.

They propose that it may be time to revisit randomised controlled trials in elderly populations. However, they add that, while awaiting an improved evidence base, elderly people should still continue to be vaccinated.

“Influenza causes many deaths every year, and even a partly effective vaccine would be better than no vaccine at all,” they say.

In an accompanying editorial, Tom Jefferson and Carlo Di Pietrantonj, of the Cochrane Vaccines Field, say that, in their opinion, randomised, placebo-controlled trials are the only ethical and scientific way to have a definitive answer to the question of whether current flu vaccines protect elderly people.

However, the trials need to be large enough to detect rare outcomes and long enough to cover more than one flu season, they say.

This year’s flu campaigns in Britain again target younger people in at-risk groups as well as those over the age of 65 years. At-risk groups include people with serious heart or chest complaints (including asthma), serious kidney or liver disease, diabetes, lowered immunity due to disease or treatment, multiple sclerosis or other degenerative conditions of the central nervous system, or anyone who has had a stroke or transient ischaemic attack.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal