Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 279 No 7472 p371
6 October 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Angry reaction across the board to latest Category M price changes

Individual contractors, multiples and wholesalers alike have reacted angrily to the announcement that substantial reductions have been made to Category M prices in the October 2007 Drug Tariff.

Noel Baumber, an independent community pharmacist from Grantham, Lincolnshire, and a member of the Independent Pharmacy Federation, told The Journal: “Contractors will be worried by the effect on cash flow, which will build up over the next quarter when they should be saving up to pay their tax bill at the end of January 2008.”

According to his calculations, an average contractor dispensing around 6,000 items per month can expect a reduction in cash flow in the order of £18,000 over six months (depending on the mix of targeted generics and the proportion of brands prescribed locally).

Mr Baumber believes that, as well as being hit by the reduction in practice payments and Drug Tariff price changes, contractors could also suffer from the continuing rise in world prices for generics. “This could make trading difficult as [prices] begin to exceed the depressed reimbursement prices and contractors are obliged to fund the difference,” he explained.

The irony, he said, is that contractors are encouraged to make purchase profits to overcome the discount deduction scale as part of the new contract structure. “Once again the averaging system will reclaim purchase profits from contractors without reference to who actually made those gains. Putting one fifth of the burden on to practice payments changes the distribution pattern of recovery.”

The Company Chemists’ Association warned that the move creates unacceptable financial instability for its members and could threaten patient care.

“In the absence of any concomitant increase in income from commissioned services, the expediency with which the Government has pursued reimbursement is compromising the coherence of the overall contract package,” said the CCA.

It added: “Emphasis on a single element of the package … creates unacceptable financial instability for our members, who are still waiting to provide the clinical services that they signed up for.”

CCA members are also concerned that the repeated focus on a small number of frequently prescribed medicines is distorting the category and jeopardising the continuity of medicines supply. The CCA is calling on all parties to remain vigilant to ensure that patients are not deprived of the medicines they need as an unintended consequence of this most recent action.

Steve Dunn, group managing director of AAH Pharmaceuticals, believes that the cut in generics reimbursement is a clear sign of a lack of commitment from the Government to community pharmacy.

Mr Dunn said that, since attempts to introduce patient services in England and Wales have failed to match expectation, pharmacists are now facing the worst of both worlds — cuts in retained purchase profit that may undermine the traditional funding model, and little evidence of Government commitment to make the new model of patient service provision a reality.

Rowlands Pharmacy has also spoken out against the changes. Paul Smith, chief executive, said: “These drastic changes to Category M prices go way beyond expectation. This highlights the unpredictability of the new arrangements and makes proper financial planning and investment virtually impossible.”

He added that it places a serious question mark over whether Category M is the appropriate mechanism for modulating the market and suggested that it may become financially unviable to manufacture some of the products listed within the category.

Mark Griffiths, chairman of buying group Cambrian Alliance, said that the last-minute news was particularly severe for independents following other recent income losses, such as those imposed through changes to the oxygen service and Pfizer’s direct-to-pharmacy distribution model.

He believes that the real challenge facing independents is how to look after purchase profit at a time when they are being urged to focus on service provision.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal