CCA does not trust PCTs to hold pharmacy money

Rob Darracott: Change may impede pharmacy developments |
Concern over the ability of primary care trusts in England to take responsibility for the global sum for NHS pharmaceutical services has been expressed by the Company Chemists' Association because of PCTs' poor record in implementing and paying for locally negotiated services.
The Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee has added that it knows
of one PCT that had started to manipulate the system in advance of the
change.
Responding to a Department of Health proposal that the global
sum be devolved to PCTs after April 2009 (PJ, 28 July, p89), the CCA said that
the global sum should not be handed down at this stage. It said that
the experience of its members was that fees for locally funded services
were not always paid, that payments were often late, and that they could
often not be reconciled with claims.
The CCA said that it wants to see an explanation of how spending will
be monitored if the change is made to ensure that money due to pharmacy
does not get diverted to pay for other PCT services.
“This shift will undoubtedly change PCT behaviour, but possibly
in ways that make it harder, rather than easier, for pharmacy to develop,” Rob
Darracott, CCA chief executive, said. “To avoid such unintended
consequences, pharmacy needs to press the DoH to match these changes
with incentives for the development and integration of pharmacy in local
care pathways.”
Similar concerns have been expressed by the PSNC, although it is happy
to see the global sum transferred to PCTs, subject to safeguards to protect
nationally negotiated agreements.
The PSNC said: “The inconsistent commissioning of enhanced services
by PCTs has demonstrated why the PSNC and pharmacy contractors were committed
to a national model. Any proposal which could have the effect of undermining
fair reimbursement and a fair return on investment would be vigorously
opposed by the PSNC and pharmacy contractors.”
The PSNC response also said that one PCT, which it did not name, had
decided to encourage GPs to write prescriptions for shorter periods with
the stated aim of increasing the number of prescriptions before the global
sum was devolved so that it would receive a greater allocation of funds
when the shift took place.
|