Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search
|
This article |
| • Enhanced services |
White PaperWho needs the Society?From Mr J. B. Paige, MRPharmS The need for the proposed 50 per cent increase in fees is based on the
bold assumption that the Royal Pharmaceutical Society must survive in a
form to be decided by Whitehall mandarins and Lambeth officials. I would
question that basic assumption. For instance, several recent statements by Society staff have spoken of opportunities and risks affecting “community pharmacists”, when they are actually talking about business matters affecting only pharmacy owners. Retail Round-Up for August had four main articles, all giving advice to maximise the profitability of pharmacy businesses. It includes not one word of help for employed pharmacists trying to offer a professional service within a fiercely commercial environment. For that sort of help, pharmacists have to turn to the website of the Pharmacists’ Defence Association. The fact that 12,000 pharmacists have voluntarily joined the PDA demonstrates the need for an organisation to represent employed pharmacists and the failure of the Society to provide that service. Similarly,
the College of Pharmacy Practice has been helping pharmacists to
expand their professional knowledge while the Society has concentrated
on
finding new income sources for pharmacy owners. Who needs the Royal Pharmaceutical Society? J. Barrie Paige |
|
|
Send your letter to The
Editor |
Previous Topic (Law) |