Pharmacy contribution to “care closer to home” agenda highlighted
Some of the ways in which services provided by pharmacists might contribute to the Government’s “care closer to home” agenda are set out in a report released earlier this week by the Department of Health.
The report — written by clinicians involved in the six specialty
subgroups of the “care closer to home” pilot — describes
how care has been shifted to community settings in the areas of orthopaedic
surgery, urology, general surgery, ear, nose and throat, gynaecology
and dermatology.
According to the report, the two areas where pharmacy has the most to
contribute are dermatology and gynaecology. The dermatology subgroup
includes Rod Tucker, a pharmacist who works as part of a multidisciplinary
community dermatology service that is one of the pilot sites (PJ, 21
October 2006, p471).
The subgroup writes that community pharmacists could play a potentially
valuable role in providing advice about appropriate skin care, particularly
since most pharmacies now have a private consultation area. It suggests
that the increasing number of topical preparations available without
prescription might allow pharmacists to treat a wider range of conditions.
However,
it warns that the pharmacist’s role should not be confused
with that of a diagnostician and patients should be referred to their
GP if doubts exist.
The subgroup also concedes that there is limited evidence of the effectiveness
of pharmacists with special interests (PhwSIs) in dermatology but says
that what evidence does exist suggests that both community pharmacists
and PhwSIs are capable of successfully providing adequate treatment and
advice.
“Providing that PhwSIs are suitably accredited there is
no reason why their role should not be developed further as part of an
accessible, integrated dermatology service,” it concludes.
The gynaecology subgroup, which does not include a pharmacist representative,
simply says that there is clear scope for pharmacists and PhwSIs in providing
care closer to home alongside, or in some cases within, an integrated
gynaecology service. It recommends that this should be further evaluated.
In the report’s foreword, health minister Ben Bradshaw says
that the Government wants people to use the report to catalyse local
changes. |