Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 279 No 7477 p528
10 November 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 50K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• Retention fees
• Concessionary fees
• Pack sizes (5)
• Prescribing
• Controlled drugs
• Hospital infections
• Wholesalers
• Locum pharmacy
• BPC


Letters to the Editor

Concessionary fees

Retention fees 2008

Privy Council hurdles

From Mr K. J. Knight, FRPharmS

The Treasurer, Andrew Gush, has set out the Privy Council’s objections to the annual concessionary fee proposals for those who have been on the Register for 50 years or more (PJ, 29 September, p350).

The stumbling block is not age discrimination but the Equality Act 2006 which, in these Orwellian days, is designed to make sure legally that everyone is treated fairly, equally, without prejudice and anything else that comes to mind (if I were young again, I would read law not pharmacy). Mr Gush does not think the letter of the law will disadvantage us but is concerned that its spirit might do so.

I have sympathy with the concern for those pharmacists who have taken time off to bring up a family, but the resolution is simple. The concession should be given to those who first registered 50 years ago or more, and there has been an appropriate break in their registration.

But the Privy Council has presented another unbelievable hurdle. It is that it might disadvantage those pharmacists who have registered in another European Economic Area state because the time practising there would not count towards the 50 years.

Again the answer is simple. Be brave, do what the French would do and ignore it.

Kenneth Jack Knight
Crewkerne, Somerset

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Retention fees)
Next Topic (Pack sizes)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal