Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search
|
This article |
| • Retention fees (3) |
Safety
Echinacea should not be used by people with AAT deficiencyFrom Mr C. A. Deeny, MRPharmS AAT deficiency, or alpha-1, is a hereditary disorder characterised by decreased levels of the serum protein alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT). AAT is the primary blocker of neutrophil elastase. Neutrophils are the first cells recruited to the site of an infection. Neutrophil elastase is a
protease enzyme released from activated neutrophils that helps to eliminate
infection or inhaled particles. However, without the protective effect
of AAT, neutrophil elastase causes lung damage. Thus AAT deficiency
leads to deterioration of lung function over time. People with AAT deficiency
have an increased risk of early-onset chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease. Given this fact it is not surprising that a patient whom I serve chose to take echinacea, assuming that it may help prevent infection and the progression of disease. However, there is evidence that echinacea acts by increasing the number and the phagocytic activity of neutrophils in vivo,1–3 although at least one in vitro study suggested that neutrophils are not activated by echinacea.4 If echinacea does act by this method, and thus causes an increased release of neutrophil elastase, then this will increase lung damage. I therefore suggest that echinacea should not be used by people with AAT deficiency until proven safe. Colin Deeny 1. Melchart D, Linde K, Worku F, Sarkady L, Holzmann M, Jurcc K, et
al. Results of five randomized studies on the immunomodulatory activity
of preparations of echinacea. Journal of Alternative and Complementary
Medicine 1995;1:145–60. Differential drug packaging could cut down errorsFrom Dr T. U. Qazi, MRPharmS Dispensing errors and “near misses” are a serious problem in a busy pharmacy. These errors are mostly caused by drug packaging being too similar, leading to the wrong dosage or medicine being dispensed. It
cannot be denied that environmental factors such as stress and fatigue
also contribute to dispensing errors. Examples of well known generics
manufacturers which have made these changes include: Actavis, Almus,
Alpha, Genus, Ivox and Teva. These new product ranges use many different
colours to signify the particular drug and dosage. Elderly patients will be most affected by the introduction of this new packaging because they are commonly subject to polypharmacy. Many of them suffer with memory loss, poor health and a lack of motivation to take medicines. Teva
Pharmaceuticals has introduced extensive colour-coded packaging into
its generics
range. However, I noticed that a couple of its new products appear
almost
identical and this can have a negative effect on drug compliance
of elderly patients
who rely on appearance of packaging to differentiate between
different medicines. T. U. Qazi Reducing medication errors in hospital wardsFrom Mr K. D. Ball, MRPharmS Having read the paper on drug
history errors by Stuart Rees et al (PJ,
27 October 2007, p469), I would like to give my own perspective on medication
safety. We have also just incorporated further enhancements which allow capture of other related data such as unlabelled syringes of liquids found on wards, medicines available to any who walk past and cupboard codes printed on the outside of the door. What we have tried to do is develop a system that records interventions, adverse drug reactions, medicines errors and other medicines risk related issues. A further enhancement has been a facility to record the number
of errors under a single or multiple entry. Such an example (just a
few months ago) of two patients on the admissions unit admitted at 7pm
on
a Friday night and both being reviewed on Monday morning at 8am with
10 medicines
missed on the clerking in of each patient. This resulted in a huge
number of errors since each missed dose is an error but nobody is going
to record
each one so we needed a pragmatic way to record these. I work for two consultants in care of the elderly and attend all their ward rounds. After an on-call or on-take period this may cover as many as 10 different wards and be up to six or seven hours long. This entails large numbers of retrospective and proactive interventions and is seen as a valuable service but also crosses over the work of other clinical pharmacists. Where it fails, however, is in the fact that I do this between the hours of 8am and 4.30pm Monday to Friday. If my consultants are on call should I not be on call with their team? This poses a different way of thinking about how pharmacy on-call services and clinical services are provided. If we provide real value then we really should have the resources to provide it when it is needed. We also need to change the way we operate
on
the wards. We are doing this by becoming consultants rather than
ward-based.
We still have our specialties but follow our team rather than
leaving work
on other wards to other specialty pharmacists. This has been
received with great enthusiasm by the consultant teams at all grades but
can we
really
break the nine-to-five mould in our provision of services? Ken Ball |
|||
|
Send your letter to The
Editor |
Previous Topic (Supervision) |