| Since introduction of the responsible pharmacist paves the way
for periods of absence from the pharmacy, it is essential that effective
procedures
are in place to ensure pharmacy staff continue to work under the direction
and authority of the responsible pharmacist when he or she is away from
the registered premises.
The responsible pharmacist will therefore be required to establish (if
necessary), maintain and review pharmacy procedures designed to secure
the safe and effective running of the pharmacy, as set out in amendments
to the Medicines Act 1968.
Two chapters in the responsible
pharmacist consultation (PJ,
3 November 2007, p494) are dedicated to the Government’s proposals
on what should be included in these procedures and what record should
be kept.
Pharmacy procedures
When establishing procedures, the Government expects responsible pharmacists
to build on experience and good practice provided by existing standard
operating procedures and to take account of guidance available from
the professional regulatory bodies and, if appropriate, the superintendent
pharmacist.
The consultation states that their needs to be a balance between
consistency and flexibility within the procedures. The Government
believes that consistency
will support an incoming responsible pharmacist in assessing whether
the procedures are comprehensive while flexibility will allow him or
her to review or amend the procedures if, in their professional judgement,
they consider this necessary.
The Government suggests the procedures should, as a minimum, cover
arrangements for: • The safe, secure and effective ordering, storage, preparation, dispensing,
sale or supply, delivery and disposal of medicines
• The supply of Controlled Drugs
• Activities that can be carried out by specified pharmacy staff and
the level of training, qualification and competence required to undertake
these
• Record keeping
• Providing advice to patients on medicines by the pharmacist and by
pharmacy staff and when they should seek advice from the responsible
pharmacist
• When the responsible pharmacist is absent
• Recording amendments to the procedures
• Responding to complaints and adverse incidents relating to the sale
and supply of medicines
• The transfer of responsibility for the pharmacy between responsible
pharmacists
The consultation asks for views on whether the procedures should include
arrangements for the sale of general sale list medicines. Its own view
is that they should, given that people may choose to buy these medicines
from a pharmacy in order to benefit from the professional advice that
is available there.
The Government proposes that the regulations allow procedures to be written
on paper or electronically, as long as they are available to those who
may need to see them.
The consultation also seeks views on whether an incoming responsible
pharmacist should have to sign to indicate that he or she is satisfied
with the procedures at the time that responsibility is assumed.
The Government’s view is that when the responsible pharmacist (including
a locum taking on responsibility for the pharmacy) takes charge, he or
she should check the pharmacy procedures and assess the need for any
changes.
“The responsible pharmacist will use his or her knowledge
of the pharmacy business and the skills and experience of staff working
in the pharmacy to satisfy him or herself that the procedures in place
support safe working in the pharmacy and that staff are working to these
procedures.”
If changes are thought necessary, for example, when a key member of staff
is absent, these can be discussed and agreed with the superintendent
pharmacist or pharmacy owner, says the consultation.
If the responsible
pharmacist reviews procedures he or she must ensure that pharmacy staff
understand new or amended procedures and how they relate to their individual
responsibilities, the consultation says.
“Any practice resulting in numerous, frequent, changes to procedures
could result in unsafe working in a pharmacy where pharmacy staff have
had
insufficient time and training to gain an understanding of changes,” it
adds.
The consultation highlights that the superintendent pharmacist role is
distinct from, but complementary to, that of the responsible pharmacist.
The superintendent will have a duty to ensure that each pharmacy has
procedures in place and that there are mechanisms for their review (see
Panel below).
Professional accountability
The responsible pharmacist is professionally accountable
for the pharmacy procedures during the period in which he or she
is in
charge of the pharmacy. If another pharmacist working in the
pharmacy, for example a locum, exercises his or her professional
judgement and does not follow the procedures, then he or she
is professionally accountable for that decision.
In a pharmacy owned by a body corporate, the responsible pharmacist
is under a statutory duty to secure the safe and effective running
of the pharmacy but is also subject to the directions of the superintendent
pharmacist.
The superintendent pharmacist has a wider, corporate
responsibility to ensure that each pharmacy has a responsible
pharmacist and that the company meets the statutory, professional
and ethical
requirements and standards for the sale and supply of medicines. |
Pharmacy record
Pharmacists will no longer have to display their registration certificates
in the pharmacy once amendments to the Medicines Act 1968 come into
force. It is thought that since more than one certificate is often
displayed, it is difficult for members of the public to determine who
is in charge.
Instead the responsible pharmacist will have to display a notice conspicuously
in the pharmacy giving a registration number and stating that he or she
is the pharmacist in charge on that date and at that time.
In addition, a record will be kept whereby each responsible pharmacist
signs in and out. The Government believes that this record should be
simple and include the name and registration number of the responsible
pharmacist, and the date and time that he or she assumed responsibility,
was absent and ceased to have responsibility.
However, informal consultations have shown that some people would like
the record to include details of the responsible pharmacist’s registration
date, the reason for their absence and information on other staff working
in the pharmacy. The Government does not support these suggestions but
asks for views on this issue.
The pharmacy record replaces the requirement for pharmacy owners to make
an annual return to the Registrar with details of the pharmacist in personal
control of the pharmacy. Instead, the owner must make sure the responsible
pharmacists keep the pharmacy record properly and must preserve it for
a period to be set out in the regulations.
Failure to do this is an offence
and owners will be subject to a fine on conviction, the consultation
states. The Government suggests that the record should be kept for
five years from the date of last entry.
The next article will look at the circumstances in which a responsible
pharmacist can be responsible for more than one pharmacy, the role
of guidance to support the changes and the time needed to prepare for
them. |