Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 279 No 7480 p623
1 December 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 40K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• Registration (3)
• Retention fees
• Influenza
• NHS
• Community pharmacy
• Ventolin
• The Society


Letters to the Editor

Ventolin

xx

Adding colourful details to Ventolin’s history

From Mr F. D. Alcraft, MRPharmS

As a young pharmacist at Allen & Hanburys, first at the premises in Ware and then at the Bethnal Green headquarters, I was involved in both the manufacture and the marketing of Ventolin (salbutamol) in 1969 immediately after its launch and can add some colourful details, that will not be known to many people, to the history retold by Jenny Bryan (PJ, 13 October 2007, p404–5).

Allen & Hanburys was so nervous of damaging its existing anti-asthma product (Choledyl — licensed from Warner Lambert) that it initially planned to sell salbutamol through a then subsidiary, Duncan Flockhart, part of British Drug Houses Limited, under the name Ventilan. This was changed quite late in the day back to the direct Allen & Hanburys route but sales were then forecast at a fraction of 1 per cent of what they actually achieved.

This situation led to “hand-to-mouth” production problems at Ware from day one. Although a trainee, I was given the day-to-day running of the aerosol plant while the real manager, Brian Russell, was specifying and buying a plant in Switzerland and elsewhere.

For many months stock levels were measured in terms of hours and I made a twice daily report on the situation. Launches to export markets were held up for a year or more because of the bottleneck.

To add to the story, David Jack, the Allen & Hanburys research and development director, who was responsible for the discovery of salbutamol, once told me he had discussed the issue of extending the action of duration of his new selective molecules with James Black, then at ICI (pre Astra Zeneca) and he (later Sir James) had suggested adding a butyl molecule — hence salbutamol.

From many later experiences with other companies and other molecules I can confirm most new drug introductions have their elements of serendipity and Ventolin was clearly no exception. None of this detracts from the enormous contribution that the research-based industry makes and my pride in being part of it.

F. David Alcraft
Chairman
Bridgehead International Ltd

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Community pharmacy)
Next Topic (The Society)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal