Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 279 No 7480 p612
1 December 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Pharmacists unaware of lack of standards for clinical support tools

British National Formulary

BNF is used to validate software alerts

Pharmacists would welcome training in the use of clinical decision support tools, according to a survey carried out by independent business consultant Sterling Consultants.

The survey of 100 pharmacists revealed that, although 95 per cent consider clinical data to be key to safer dispensing, 68 per cent admitted they do not know where data on their patient medication record (PMR) system come from and 81 per cent were surprised that no standards cover the production of data used in clinical support tools.

Forty-eight per cent of respondents said they had received no training in the use of decision support tools and 70 per cent said they would attend training if it were offered. The survey also found that 87 per cent of respondents validate clinical decision support alerts that they doubt, and that a variety of sources are used — 52 per cent consult the British National Formulary and 5 per cent use Google.

Geoff Mackay, director of Stirling Consultants, said that as prescription numbers grow and pharmacists embrace emerging clinical roles, more trust placed in the clinical elements of PMR systems could result in higher efficiency.

He said: “Adoption of standards by PMR system vendors and specialist clinical decision support vendors would go some way to neutralising some of the user issues and give these valuable tools a higher profile.”

Mr Mackay suggested pharmacists join a user group, ask where clinical data come from, ask when data for new products appear on their systems and ask PMR suppliers about plans to improve clinical decision support.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal