Home > PJ (current issue) > News Feature | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 279 No 7481 p642-643
8 December 2007

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 60K, Acrobat Reader

News feature

ETP: a step closer to reality in Scotland

Electronic transfer of prescriptions is essential to the next stage of the new community pharmacy contract in Scotland. Clare Bellingham reports on the latest developments


In one community pharmacy near Perth, the electronic transfer of prescriptions (ETP) is a reality: 99 per cent of prescriptions are now received in this way. This marks the start of Scotland’s acute medication service (eAMS), the third of the four core services to be implemented under the new community pharmacy contract. eAMS is dependent on ETP and it should be operating in every pharmacy in Scotland by next autumn.

Alison Strath, principal pharmaceutical officer, Scottish Govern-ment, says: “eAMS will be phased in, starting this month but in the main from January 2008, with a view to it being in place across Scotland by September 2008 at the latest.” She points out: “eAMS does not require everyone to be ready for a specific date, which means that we can afford to phase the implementation to allow for all the technical and administrative complexities that arise when implementing the electronic transfer, dispensing and processing of prescriptions.”

Alex MacKinnon, head of corporate affairs at Community Pharmacy Scotland, comments: “We are pleased with the progress in the pilot sites, which we have already visited. Both the Scottish Government and Community Pharmacy Scotland are keen to see an early introduction of ETP functionality to support the planned implementation of both eAMS and the chronic medication service.”

Testing proves system works

Andy Watson

Pharmacist Andy Watson scans in prescriptions

ETP is being tested in Scotland at Davidson’s Chemists in Bridge of Earn, Perthshire, in collaboration with the system provider and the Scottish Government.

Andy Watson, pharmacy manager, says: “It has exceeded my expectations. The system worked from the first moment it was set up and it has been straightforward to use.”

Of course, the whole point of having a test site is to identify problems before the system is rolled out. But, nearly two months after the system was installed, Mr Watson says the number of issues that have had to be resolved has been small.

Karen Gordon, operations manager at Davidson’s Chemists, comments: “It has been a case of ironing a few things out. From our experience as a test site, we believe that ETP is currently working extremely well. This is demonstrated by the fast and efficient downloading and creation of the electronic messages.”

How eAMS works is explained in the Panel (p643). The system on test at Davidson’s is provided by Cegedim Rx but, since all pharmacy computer system suppliers were given the same service specification, others are expected to be similar.

“Both the GP and community pharmacy system suppliers were given specifications, which detailed the necessary requirements and the optional extras or desirable features,” explains Ms Strath.

“The same core functionality has been integrated into the individual systems’ existing dispensing functionality therefore the systems still retain their key differentiators. The testing phase allows us to ensure the eAMS programme deliverables have been included and to check the impact at the pharmacy.”

Cegedim Rx appears to have been quick to deliver eAMS but, according to managing director Simon Driver, the company has simply delivered what was agreed. “The Scottish Government and Atos Origin [NHS Scotland’s IT partner] were realistic about when things could be achieved and asked us when we could deliver eAMS. We have delivered to that agreed timescale,” he says. “The testing has gone exceptionally well.”

Mr Driver adds: “The Scottish approach has been measured and realistic about what it is trying to achieve. It has taken bite-sized chunks that give benefits, like eMAS [the minor ailment service], which has been successful with patients and pharmacists. This is what software is designed to do: to enable.”

Mrs Gordon explains why they offered to be a test site: “Cegedim asked us if we wanted to test the system at one of our pharmacies. At the same time, NHS Tayside identified the GP surgery in Bridge of Earn as one of the practices that was ahead of the game in installing ETP software. So we fitted the two together.

“Of course it means extra work for Andy but it helps that he is a keen, IT-literate pharmacist who doesn’t mind lots of people visiting the pharmacy to see how the system works.”

Mr Watson points out: “Testing works here because there is only one GP surgery and one pharmacy in Bridge of Earn so we dispense the majority of their prescriptions, and have a close working relationship.”

The process of ETP is clearly successful, demonstrated by the fact that 99 per cent of prescriptions received by the pharmacy are now in electronic form. But what are the advantages? Mr Watson highlights data entry being faster, particularly for new patients, and the fact that it cuts the risk of labelling errors.

“When you dispense a new item, the computer selects the item based on the DM+D [dictionary of medicines and devices] code so you can’t pick the wrong product,” he explains. Not only does this prevent data-entry errors but it is also useful for quickly identifying what a prescriber intends when prescriptions for items, such as dressings, are written generically.

“Another big advantage is that if the surgery wants to telephone through a prescription, I just ask the receptionist for the unique number printed on the prescription form. I can then key that in and confirm the details back to the receptionist. This is so much safer than taking prescription details over the phone,” Mr Watson adds. “I also believe it will save me time in the future,” he says.

However, as a pilot site, the time he has saved so far in prescription processing is currently spent auditing the system as part of the pilot or demonstrating the system to visitors who are keen to see how the new technology works.

Another change eAMS will bring is that prescriptions will be priced using electronic data sent to Practitioner Services during the dispensing process, rather than manual pricing using paper prescriptions. Ms Gordon explains that part of the pilot involves prescriptions being priced both using the new electronic data and in the traditional way: these prices will then be compared. The results of this are not yet available.

Mr MacKinnon adds: “Community Pharmacy Scotland continues to work with Practitioner Services Division on the implications for contractors of the introduction of the ePay programme.”

With the pharmacy end of the pilot positive, what do the doctors involved think of ETP? “Good so far,” says Beena Raschkes, GP at the Bridge of Earn surgery. “Inevitably there have been problems — but there should be, we are a pilot. We’ve certainly tested the system with patient treatment, new partners joining and huge list transfers. But the process has worked well.”

Dr Raschkes adds: “The whole process is safer for us as prescribers and for patients. Although it currently brings little change for us, it provides the security of knowing that we are reducing risks of transcription errors, reducing ‘missing’ prescriptions and reducing fraudulent script changes.”

With eAMS just around the corner, what advice would Mr Watson — having experienced ETP — give to other pharmacists? “Without a doubt, it is to make sure they are recording patients’ exemption status on their pharmacy computer records now,” he says. He explains that if exemption status is recorded in advance, it makes the dispensing process faster because otherwise it has to be entered when the prescription is collected.

“Looking to the future, we would like the ETP system to be interfaced with our EPOS [electronic point of sale] system at the till. Then we could enter payment details at the point of giving the prescription out. This would complete the audit trail: the prescription would be scanned in when received, dispensed electronically, and then scanned out when picked up, so it would be possible to see exactly when it was processed,” he comments.

Mrs Gordon adds: “I would tell pharmacists not to panic about [buying] additional IT since the only piece of new hardware is a scanner. It would also be worth speaking to your patient medication records provider now to find out when they will be ready to provide eAMS, and to talk to your EPOS provider to see if any integration of counter and dispensary systems is in the pipeline.”

Ms Strath says that some variation exists between the different computer software suppliers in terms of when they will be ready to implement their version of eAMS. “This reflects a number of different issues such as hardware requirements and upgrades, the scheduling of system upgrades, and the logistics of upgrading and training,” she explains.

All the GP system suppliers have now passed the Scottish Enhanced Functionality accreditation (which is a system of accrediting software developments). Four out of five suppliers have completed the beta testing of software and have permission to start rolling out their software to GP practices.

“It is expected that this will start in earnest from January but some will be upgraded during December. To date, 40 GP sites are now enabled for ETP,” says Ms Strath.

Two pharmacy system suppliers have completed beta testing of their software and are now ready to start rolling out software. A further two are about to enter fitness for purpose testing (which is the pharmacy equivalent of Scottish Enhanced Functionality accreditation) and the other three system suppliers are expecting to start this stage of testing early next year.

“Roll out starts in the main from January (2008) with some upgrades possible during December,” says Ms Strath. “We had thought about a big launch in December but no-one really wanted to introduce new software during the busiest dispensing month of the year.” Areas of the country most likely to see early implementation of ETP are Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Lanarkshire, Ayrshire and Arran, and Tayside.

Dave Green, ePharmacy programme manager, Atos Origin Alliance, says: “It is great to see the start of the national roll-out of eAMS in both GP practices and community pharmacies. It comes as a result of hard work in terms of supplier groups, health boards, the Scottish Government and National Services Scotland.

It is also important to recognise how clinicians have brought about the success by integrating the solution into the day-to-day working processes, as well as the technical perspective. There’s lots more to do but this is a great milestone for us.”

Ms Strath is equally positive. “eAMS testing has already identified some positive benefits. These include improvements in matching patient details, in supporting accurate drug selection, in reducing transcription errors and in reducing the number of key strokes,” she says.

“I really want to thank the pharmacists and support staff involved in testing of the systems because they undertake all of the hard work in testing the software to suit working practices. All other pharmacies will benefit from their endeavours.”

How ETP works within the acute medication service in Scotland

Pt (shapiso) Lee /Dreamstime.com

Computer mouse

Once a GP practice and a community pharmacy both have the computer equipment in place to operate the electronic acute medication service (eAMS), how does it work?

The first step is for the GP to produce the prescription. When he or she presses “print” a prescription, with a barcode printed down the left hand side, is generated. At the same time, an electronic message is automatically created which is sent to a central ePharmacy message store.

The prescription also contains a unique prescription reference number and, printed under each item, is the drug’s Dictionary of Medicines and Devices (DM+D) code.

Next, the patient is given the paper prescription (which remains the legal document) and presents it at a pharmacy. The pharmacist or pharmacy assistant scans the barcode on the prescription, which causes the prescription details to be pulled down from the ePharmacy message store to the pharmacy computer.

When the pharmacist is ready to dispense the prescription, the first step is to click on the “dispense” icon. This brings up the details of the prescription on one side of the screen and the dispensing details on the other side.

The software matches the patient’s details to those on the pharmacy's computer records, searching by community health index (CHI) number. It suggests a match, which must be confirmed by the pharmacist. If the patient is new to the pharmacy, his or her details are automatically entered into the computer’s records from the information on the prescription.

Likewise, if any patient information is missing from the pharmacy’s records, these are automatically entered from the prescription details.

Next, the patient’s medication record is brought up. This allows the pharmacist to select an item from the patient’s repeat list if the patient has had the prescribed drug before. The computer then checks using the DM+D code that it is an appropriate selection for the item prescribed.

If it is an item that the patient has not had before, the computer matches the drug and offers a list of generic products or brands (if there is more than one) containing the drug using the DM+D code. This reduces the possibility of selecting the wrong drug.

The product’s details and prescriber’s directions are then automatically filled on the computer's dispensing screen, and the quantity is then manually added or confirmed. Once all the information is in place, dispensing labels are printed. The system then asks if the patient pays for prescriptions, or if he or she is exempt from NHS prescription charges. This can be recorded on a patient’s record but, in the case of exemptions where status can change, may need to be confirmed each time.

To finish the prescription, endorsing details must be added. Apart from what has been dispensed (according to the DM+D code) and its pack size, any additional details such as special prices, “prescriber contacted” information or out-of-pocket expenses can be added in a separate screen.

It is possible to print these onto the paper prescription too using an endorsing printer or they can be written by hand: this is down to the personal preference of the pharmacist.

Finally, the prescription details are sent to Practitioner Services for payment by clicking “send”. Alternatively, it can be put into a “pending” status to add or amend details at a later stage, such as if the patient's exemption details are not known at the time of dispensing or if an invoice price needs to be added to the endorsing details.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal