When the oyster will offer the world
True
oysters are considered to belong solely to the family Ostreidae, with
the common European oyster (Ostrea edulis) the best known here.
However, other varieties have proved palatable, most notably the American
oyster, Crassostrea virginica.
The oyster has provided sustenance
to those prepared to run the slight risk of food poisoning from a “bad” one
(usually arising from an unexpected decrease in water quality — oysters
insist on unpolluted water to filter feed) for thousands of years. For
most of this time they have been so ubiquitous (and therefore cheap)
that Charles Dickens made his character Sam Weller observe, in ‘The
Pickwick Papers’, “oysters and poverty go together”.
At
about the time of Dickens writing this, the rapid industrialisation
of Britain, with the concomitant explosion of the urban populations
caused such a steep decline in water quality that the nation’s
oyster beds were virtually destroyed; oysters were never cheap again
after that.
The oyster has been subject to various misconceptions; for instance,
that they are more likely to be bad during the months with no “r”,
between April and September. This myth is believed to have been originally
propagated in order to discourage harvesting during the spawning period,
to allow the population to stay constant: a pity, perhaps, that no one
tried that one with cod.
The other thing that everyone “knows” about
the oyster is its aphrodisiac powers; this has never been scientifically
proved (though heaven knows why not — anytime they feel like conducting
controlled experiments, I’m in) although they are known to be high
in zinc, an important co-factor in testosterone production.
Today, a possible new use of the oyster is being investigated. Scientists
at the French Natural History Museum (Musée National d’Histoire
Naturelle) believe that nacre, the substance secreted by oysters to prevent
irritation by trapped grit particles (turning them into pearls) could
be useful in stimulating bone growth, offering the eventual prospect
of a treatment for bone deficiency disorders, particularly osteoporosis.
They claim to have observed a perfect bond between nacre and bone in in
vivo bone
grafts; they also believe that nacre may assist the body’s
own natural bone regeneration process by stimulating the production of
osteoblasts over osteoclasts (bone builders and bone crumblers respectively,
a mnemonic I devised when I was doing physiology).
Needless to say, this
is still a long way from a practical treatment for osteoporosis; but
even if it eventually proves to be a dead end, it may have the consequence
of boosting oyster cultivation in the 21st century. In which case oysters
might become affordable again.
Back to Top
|