Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7484 p5
5/12 January 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Technicians in Scotland to be registered by Society

Other suggested amendments

The draft Order also sets out:

• A new main objective for the Society that introduces the concept of well-being, which is intended to reflect the changing focus of healthcare from cure to prevention and health promotion

• Plans for temporarily re-registering recently retired pharmacists in cases of national emergency where the numbers of pharmacists available for practice might be insufficient — pandemic influenza is an example

• Suitably qualified technicians could be temporarily registered as pharmacists

• An extended duty of co-operation with health service managers

• Wider requirements for submitting an annual report and a strategic plan to the Privy Council

• A requirement to explain annually how the Society complies with the Equality Act 2006

Pharmacy technicians in Scotland will soon be able to register with the Royal Pharmaceutical Society.

Shortly before Christmas 2007, the Department of Health launched a consultation on a draft Health Care and Associated Professions (Miscellaneous Amendments) (No 2) Order 2008.

This seeks to amend the Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians Order 2007, among other legislation, to bring pharmacy technicians working in Scotland into the voluntary registration arrangements currently applicable to technicians working in England, Wales, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man.

Although the amendments will come into force when the new Order is made, technician registration will remain voluntary throughout Great Britain until the Secretary of State for Health (responsible for professional regulation in England and Wales) and the Scottish Parliament jointly agree a date for it to become a practice requirement.

Hemant Patel, the Society’s President, said: “This amendment to the Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians Order 2007 is good news because it will promote consistency throughout Great Britain.”

Jeremy Holmes, the Society’s chief executive, said: “When the Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians Order 2007 was published, we were disappointed to see that it did not cover regulation of pharmacy technicians in Scotland. We have been urging the Government to rectify this omission ever since and so I am delighted to see that things are moving in this area.”

However, Mr Holmes added that the Society had concerns about some elements of the proposed Order.

These include the absence of any provision for temporarily broadening the register of technicians in cases of national emergency and the absence of provisions for making temporarily registered persons subject to the usual fitness to practise requirements in relation to their usual registration status.

The draft Order also contains a provision that would make it possible for both the Society’s Education Committee and its Continuing Professional Development Committee to discharge the current functions of the CPD Committee. This concerns the Society because of the different functions of the two committees: the Education Committee deals with the initial training of pharmacists and the CPD Committee decides whether people can return to, or should be removed from, the Register.

A further area of concern is that the Order does not seek to amend the definition of suspension from the Register in relation to interim orders. As it stands, the Society believes that a suspended, unincorporated sole proprietor pharmacist would be forced to sell his business even though any allegations might subsequently be disproved.

The Society wants as many pharmacists and technicians as possible to send comment on the proposals to the DoH. Consultation on the draft Order ends on 22 March 2008.



See Article p26

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal