Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7485 p52
19 January 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 70K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• Industrial pharmacists (4)
• Community pharmacy
• Responsible pharmacist (2)
• Package design
• The profession (2)
• The Society (3)
• Registration (2)
• Statins
• Retirement (2)
• Onlooker
• Caption competition


Letters to the Editor

The profession

Women in pharmacy (Miss T. M. Gaughan)

Flexible working (Mr W. Wright)

Reply from John Evans, superintendent pharmacist, Asda Stores

Women in pharmacy

From Miss T. M. Gaughan, MRPharmS

Some areas of pharmacy appear to be stuck in the last millennium. I quote Asda’s superintendent pharmacist John Evans (PJ, 15 December 2007, p689): “With 54 per cent of pharmacists [being] women, it offers flexible working — when their partner comes home in the evening it means he can look after the children and she can go off to work.”

What a wonderful family picture that creates, with the man being the breadwinner and the woman having a supplementary job. I am certainly not saying people should not do that, but in 2008 I certainly do not think it is the norm and nor should it have to be.

I thought I had hit a “high” for sexist comments when my careers tutor told me that pharmacy was a good job for a woman.

On a similar point, how 100-hour pharmacies can be family friendly is unknown to me. Surely it just means that the family is separated for more hours a week as companies put increasing pressure on part-time staff to take the shifts during unsociable hours?

Tracey Gaughan
Glasgow


Flexible working

From Mr W. Wright

John Evans, Asda’s superintendent pharmacist, has succinctly identified some of the flexible working opportunities that 100-hour pharmacies will offer pharmacists, giving child care as a particular example (PJ, 15 December 2007, p689).

More specifically, he made it clear that these benefits would be particularly relevant to a group of pharmacists who make up approximately half (54 per cent) of the workforce.

Would Mr Evans care to elaborate on how the relevance of these opportunities differs in any way with regard to the remaining (male) 46 per cent?

Wesley Wright
Dumbarton

 

JOHN EVANS, superintendent pharmacist, Asda Stores, responds:

May I apologise to any reader who thought that my comments were sexist or stereotypical, as they certainly were not meant to be. Asda is an equal opportunities employer and we do not discriminate against any individual or treat them less favourably on the grounds of their sex, marital status, sexual orientation, disability, race, religion, colour, nationality, ethnic origin or age.

The article referred to opportunities in working as a pharmacist and in particular, extended opening and 100-hour pharmacies.

I talk to many pharmacists in my role, both ones that work with us and ones that do not. The issue that we have in the UK is not that there are an insufficient number of pharmacists on the Register, but that too many are leaving the practising profession either because it does not excite them anymore, or because it is too difficult to fit in work with their busy lives.

Yes, there are more “househusbands” than ever before, but the reality is that there are more female than male pharmacists, and they will, rightly so, start families. Many of these mothers will then either choose to, or have to, look after the children during the day, even in this century.

Many community pharmacies tend to be closed after 6pm, while Asda pharmacies are open much later, and this clearly gives pharmacist “househusbands” or “housewives” the chance to work and keep their hand in. Pharmacists do not have to work at these times — it just gives them more choice to do so, when and where it suits them best.

In reference to the question “are 100-hour pharmacies family friendly?”, well I have two young children and I have often used late night pharmacies to get advice and medicines when others have been closed and, looking at our business trends, I am not the only one.

As long as applicants are professional pharmacists who can easily share what they know with their pharmacy colleagues and their customers and are willing to be innovative and take the profession forward, we do not mind if they are mothers or fathers, male or female, or any variation on the theme. We would love to hear from them.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Package design)
Next Topic (The Society)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal