Home > PJ (current issue) > News Feature | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7487 p111
2 February 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 40K, Acrobat Reader

News feature

Making the case for a pharmacy-based minor ailments scheme for England

New figures suggests that minor ailments take up one fifth of GPs’ time. Tom Moberly (on the staff of The Journal) looks at the research behind this finding


The research
IMS analysed anonymised patient records from its database of 210 general practices across the UK, covering four million patient records and 190 million prescriptions.

Data from 500,000 UK patients who had consulted their GP about a minor ailment suggested that, in 2006–07, 51.4 million GP consultations a year were solely for minor ailments.

Estimated at eight minutes per consultation, this represents 18 per cent of GPs’ workload or an hour a day for each GP.

The total cost to the NHS of these consultations is £1.8bn and 80 per cent of this (£1.5bn) is attributable to the cost of GPs’ time.

In addition, 10 minor ailments are responsible for 75 per cent of the cost of minor ailments consultations and 85 per cent of the cost of prescriptions for minor ailments. These are:

• back pain
• indigestion
• dermatitis
• nasal congestion
• constipation
• migraine
• acne
• cough
• sprains and strains
• headache

Time spent by GPs providing treatment and reassurance to patients who could treat themselves is troubling to anyone concerned about efficient use of healthcare resources. Such consultations have long been thought to make up a large part of GPs’ work but there has been little quantitative evidence on this subject.

To fill this gap the Proprietary Association of Great Britain commissioned IMS Health to examine the minor ailment workload in general practice.

In a joint submission to the consultation on the White Paper on pharmaceutical services, the PAGB and the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee set out the results of the research and question current use of NHS resources and GPs’ time.

The PAGB and the PSNC propose a national scheme for England in which pharmacy is the first port of call for all cases of minor ailments.

Pharmacies could offer reassurance and advice, or referral to another part of the NHS and they could supply over-the-counter medicines and prescription-only medicines on the NHS for people who are exempt from prescription charges.

The scheme could also support people’s current practice of responsible self-care and self-medication. People who go to their GP for such treatment could be given information to widen their choices. National, regional and local communications could endorse the programme.

Mechanisms to recruit people into self-care and the national minor ailments scheme could include the use of a “self-care prescription” by GPs. This would reassure patients and encourage them to go to the pharmacy in the first instance in future.

In terms of reassurance, pharmacy has a considerable advantage over NHS Direct or other avenues open to patients, PAGB head of public affairs Gopa Mitra argued at a press briefing to launch the proposed scheme. “Compared with NHS Direct — either the website or the telephone service — you are actually seen.” This factor would, she hoped, help people see the benefits of a pharmacy service and ensure the scheme becomes a success.

Minor ailmentsRoger Scarlett-Smith, president of the PAGB, remarked that he had struggled to find anyone who would lose out from this scheme. “It seems to be a win for everybody,” he said.

“It has benefits for patients in becoming more empowered to treat their own ailments, benefits for the health service in better targeting resources and making savings which can then be redistributed, benefits for the pharmacist in actually playing a more leading role in managing minor ailments and, of course, benefits for the industry in terms of supporting growth in this area.”

The PAGB and the PSNC have sent details of the research and their scheme to the pharmacy White Paper team, Lord D’Arzi’s review of primary care services and the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Primary Care and Public Health inquiry into GP access, as well as MPs and peers.

Sue Sharpe, chief executive of the PSNC, believes the figures make a compelling case for supporting the scheme. “The potential to release time of GPs and allow them to focus on other activities, and the potential to use the funds that can be released from this to better effect, is really such that I believe the Government has a case to answer as to why not, rather than us having a case to answer as to why?”

The imminent White Paper on pharmaceutical services and the Government’s focus on primary care ahead of the 60th anniversary of the NHS mean the proposal has come at an opportune moment and offers a chance to push policy forward, Mrs Sharpe argues.

“Not all aspects of Government health policy lead to measurable change,” she said. “Some of them disappear. Some of them simply do not come to fruition. So this is an attempt to kick start broad policy.” This is, she says, a way in which pharmacy can move forward to implement some of what the Government is seeking to achieve in its broader policy objectives.

Mrs Sharpe said she would want to see the scheme implemented in the community pharmacy contract as an essential or advanced service.

She acknowledged that much of the detail still had to be worked out, but stressed the importance of minimising the bureaucracy of such a scheme, so that documentation and form-filling processes do not themselves become disincentives to participating, but said she hoped the scheme would have appropriate input from trained pharmacy staff as well as pharmacists.

Wales and Scotland

Ministers in Wales are considering developing a national minor ailments scheme (PJ, 24 November 2007, p575).

Scotland’s national minor ailment scheme began in July 2006.

Alex MacKinnon, head of corporate affairs at Community Pharmacy Scotland, comments: “Patients like it and pharmacists like it and it has really started to make a difference to the pharmaceutical care of patients who are exempt from NHS prescription charges. What I am most pleased about is that it is improving access to consultations, advice and medicines for common illnesses and allowing community pharmacists to prescribe where appropriate.”

He adds: “I think the commitment within a national contract has been important to its success and I can see why our colleagues in England want to do something similar on a national basis.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal