|
Already 17 per cent of the UK population are aged over 65 years and
this figure is predicted to rise to 25 per cent by 2015.
With an increasing
population of the frail elderly and those over 85, older people make
up a high percentage of users of NHS and social care resources in all
care settings. Older people take more medicines
Older people take more medicines than any other age group and account
for about 50 per cent of the NHS drug bill mainly via repeat prescriptions
(80 per cent). Of the over 75s, 36 per cent take four or more different
medicines regularly (polypharmacy). Changes associated with ageing
have significant effects on how medicines are handled in older people,
making them more generally sensitive and prone to adverse drug reactions
(ADRs), particularly falls, confusion, delirium, gastrointestinal bleeds
and haematological reactions.
The over 65s are three times more likely
to be admitted to hospital because of an ADR than the under 30s. The
National Service Framework for Older People (2001) suggests that approximately
two thirds of hospital patients are over 65. Evidence shows that 5–17
per cent of admissions are due to ADRs, of which 80 per cent are predictable
and preventable.
However, not all older people are at the same risk of ADRs and other
medicines problems, and it is helpful to consider members of higher risk
categories. These risks are related to a number of factors, including
drug (number, type or formulation), patient (multiple co-morbidities,
physical, mental health or socio-economic status) and environmental factors
(institutionalised, housebound and access to care).
Older people in higher
risk categories should be actively targeted and managed by pharmacists
to ensure they gain maximum benefits from and minimise the risks of medicines
they take.
In order of risk, polypharmacy is the single most important factor when
predicting the risk of ADRs in older people. Many studies show a direct
relationship between the number of drugs taken and the increase in ADRs
and correlate this to poor health outcomes.
Specific drugs and classes of drugs have also been implicated in ADRs.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are associated with a high risk
of gastrointestinal and cardiovascular effects, ACE inhibitors with renal
effects, anticoagulants with haematological effects and psychotropic
drugs with a higher risk of falls and confusion. A recent US study identified
insulin, warfarin and digoxin as accounting for 33 per cent of visits
to emergency departments.
Other wider determinants of health have an impact on how older people
use their medicines and hence the expected therapeutic outcomes. Impaired
physical, sensory and cognitive function are more common in older people,
with half of all disabled people being over 65 and 90 per cent having
a visual impairment. Behavioural factors associated with patients’ values
and perceptions, as well as social economic factors such as poverty,
isolation and lack of social support, contribute to increasing medicines-related
problems. Older people in care homes have been shown, from a body of
UK and international research evidence, to be exposed to a high level
of polypharmacy and inappropriate
prescribing.
Finally the lack of a high-quality evidence base around the use of drugs
in the over 85s, and good practice guidelines to address prescribing
in older people with multiple co-morbidities, can lead to under- and
over prescribing.
Pharmacist-led medication review trials have not demonstrated benefits
of the broad-brush approach to medication review. Research has shown
that a highly trained clinical pharmacist based in a GP surgery could
decrease cost and optimise prescribing, although one study demonstrated
that medication review of the housebound elderly by community pharmacists
was of no demonstrable benefit.
Other studies or service models have proactively targeted and identified
those at a higher risk of medicine-related problems and focused the time
and resources of a pharmacist for these patients. Pharmacists undertaking
work with these patients had demonstrated competencies and had completed
the accredited formal training to undertake this type of clinical review
in older people.
This model of care is in line with the NSF for long- term conditions
(LTCs), which recommends that populations should be stratified according
to levels of risk, and then targeted for the delivery of care by the
practitioner with the appropriate skills and expertise. Pharmacists with
specialist older people skills are a scarce resource and it is known
that not all older people need this high level of pharmaceutical input
or monitoring.
It is vital that those with a higher risk are targeted,
and matched to the older people pharmacist, and so enable more generalist
pharmacists and other practitioners to manage those at medium to lower
risk. This model mirrors the approach of community nursing with the
introduction of community matrons to support vulnerable populations.
However, in the UK, older people at high risk from using medicines
are not always easily identified. Where matrons can use patients at
risk
of readmission (PARRs) data to target their population, there is no
equivalent for medication risk. In addition there is no robust formal
process of
referral for pharmaceutical care.
The NSF for LTC recommends case finding
using validated tools as an established method to identify older
people at risk of functional decline and this principle can be adapted
to
assess older people with
medication-related risks.
Many studies, care models and guidelines have attempted to identify
and target older people in a variety of settings with a higher risk
of medication
related problems. One identified 24 specific drugs that increase
the risks of ADRs. However other models identified increasing number
of
drugs/doses, patient factors and other drug-related factors.
In the
UK, the NSF for
Older People also takes this approach and identifies older people
who are more at risk from taking medicines as being in the following
categories:
social isolation; multiple drug therapy; multiple diseases; those
taking certain drugs (eg, warfarin); those recently released from
hospital;
and those with sensory or physical impairment, confusion or depression.
This approach of identification and subsequent management (carrying
out further assessments and interventions) can help promote independence,
prevent deterioration and reduce demand for services.
Similarly those at a lower risk can be identified with the help
of simple tools that can be used by a range of carers, health and
non-health
practitioners.
For example, the Single Assessment Process medicines trigger questions
are intended to identify older people who have needs in the areas
of access, compliance, day-to-day management and clinical aspects.
The
COUNT tool identified
five patient factors
that may indicate that patients may be at risk from not taking
their medicines. Implementation
Although there is still no evidence-based tool that allows pharmacists
to identify patients at the highest risk from their medicines, the
risk factors are well known. The Clinical Pharmacy Network (within
East and South East England specialist pharmacy services) has recently
been exploring ways to tackle this.
Pharmacists need to work with
community matrons, social services, community pharmacists, GP practices
and district
nurses to refine a list in their local area. Similarly, hospital
pharmacy practitioners working with medical, nursing, social service
and therapy
colleagues in acute assessment units as well as on medical and
surgical wards can produce a list of key indicators for patients on admission
and at discharge.
A cross-sector referral system is critical to
the
success of these developments. Primary and secondary health and
social care must work together to share local knowledge, creating bespoke
indicators in order to maximise use of the pharmacy resources
available in their area. |