Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7492 p268
8 March 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


IPF calls for emergency funding for independents

Changes to Category M reimbursement prices, implemented last October, are having a significant impact on independent contractors’ ability to pay their bills and manage cash flows, the Independent Pharmacy Federation stated this week. The IPF has called for the Department of Health to provide emergency funding for independent contractors so they can continue to provide NHS pharmacy services.

The IPF claims that there has been no increase in net profits in community pharmacy since the introduction of the contract in England and Wales in 2005.

“Category M price changes are unfair and inequitable as a method for discount recovery as the impact on individual contractors varies widely,” the body states. “Worse still, contractors who have bought a business recently are being penalised for ‘excess purchase profits’ they have never made and cannot quantify.”

According to the IPF the community pharmacy contract fails to allow for the creation of capital to invest in providing for growth in prescription volume or the increased costs of delivering high-quality pharmaceutical care. It views the contract as “not fit for purpose” and driven by prescription volume that is neither patient-focused nor rewarding of outcomes.

“The limit of £500m set for the supposed ‘purchase profits’ component of the contract is completely arbitrary and apparently insufficient to run the pharmacy service,” it says.

The IPF calls for Category M prices to be “revised to a realistic level” by April and for the DoH and the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee to review the cost of operating under the current contract which, the IPF believes, is significantly more expensive to service.

Numark members Cash flow problems following changes to Category M were flagged up by members of Numark’s pharmacy advisory board at a recent meeting. John D’Arcy, interim managing director at Numark, said: “The consensus was that we need a fair and consistent system that enables proper business planning, especially at a time when pharmacists need to invest in people and premises.”

He argued: “Is Category M the right mechanism for adjusting the reimbursement? It doesn’t look as if it is working and we strongly urge the PSNC to review the situation with the DoH.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal