Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7493 p306
15 March 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 60K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• Category M medicines
• Community pharmacy (3)
• Primary care contracts
• 100-hour pharmacies
• PCT commissioning
• Prescription charges
• Medicines use reviews
• Dispensing
• Minor ailment scheme
• Adverse drug reactions
• Asthma management (2)
• Non-practising status
• The Society


Letters to the Editor

Primary care contracts

Break the doctors’ monopoly

From Mr Y. K. Tang, MRPharmS

I am amazed that the chairman of the British Medical Association’s GPs Committee is advising his members to ignore primary care trust requests for information on practice opening hours and appointments (HSJ, 14 February 2008).

GPs must be one of most blessed groups of private contractors on earth. Imagine a car manufacturer having almost the entire UK car industry to itself; able to dictate the price it is paid for products and the opening hours of its showrooms, while blocking and sabotaging attempts by other manufacturers to enter the market; receiving “incentives” to provide a high-quality and efficient service, which it already has the exclusive right to provide; being given taxpayers’ money to install a new computer system that is essential to provide its next-generation products — all these while lecturing others that its main concern is its customers, while it threatens to boycott attempts to “privatise” the industry.

It is time GPs admitted that general medical practice needs serious “restructuring”. Two models come to mind: UK community pharmacy and Australian general practice. Both involve local commissioning by centrally appointed agencies and are excellent examples of public-private partnerships.

Patient choice precipitates cost-efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Competition is a powerful motivator, as customers vote with their feet. Having to register with a practice is a major obstacle to health reform, as is the reluctance to allow non-GPs to contract for general medical services.

The argument that GP-patient registration is one of the bedrocks of the UK primary care system is flawed. Patients in Australia are not required to register with a GP or practice. They carry a Medical Benefits Scheme (MBS) card and can use it to see any GP. UK patients are not required to register with a community pharmacy. Yet, most develop a long-term provider-patient relationship with their pharmacists.

The UK general practice system no longer works. It is time people and politicians admitted that GP practices are run as businesses and the most powerful stakeholders are neither patients nor taxpayers.

Multiplicity of service provision means nothing if patients are not allowed to exercise choice. A private enterprise that takes corporate social responsibility seriously can provide as good a service as a GP practice. But would any politician have the courage to take on the most powerful trade union in the NHS to introduce reforms that are long overdue? And, would the public have the insight to support those who do have that courage?

Jonathan Tang
Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Community pharmacy)
Next Topic (100-hour pharmacies)


Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal