Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7493 p308
15 March 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 60K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• Category M medicines
• Community pharmacy (3)
• Primary care contracts
• 100-hour pharmacies
• PCT commissioning
• Prescription charges
• Medicines use reviews
• Dispensing
• Minor ailment scheme
• Adverse drug reactions
• Asthma management (2)
• Non-practising status
• The Society


Letters to the Editor

Adverse drug reactions

Miconazole oral gel and warfarin

From Miss S. Baker, MRPharmS

I have become increasingly concerned about the lack of awareness among community pharmacists about the potentiation effect that miconazole oral gel has on warfarin.

I run community based INR clinics in County Durham, and over the past year I have had two cases where miconazole oral gel has been sold to patients taking warfarin. In both cases, the patient’s INR increased drastically from their stable 2–3 range, to 15 in the first case and 9.5 in the second case.

The first patient had to be admitted to hospital for vitamin K treatment and the second patient was admitted with haematurea. The risk of bleeding to the patient at this high INR cannot be under-estimated. Yellow cards have been completed on the above reactions. A third patient was sold the gel, but checked with the warfarin clinic first and we stopped her using it.

A quick literature search of the interaction shows numerous examples of dangerously high INRs when miconazole oral gel is used with warfarin. This interaction has a black dot in the BNF, yet patients are being placed at high risk of bleeding by being given the oral gel.

Miconazole oral gel should never be used concomitantly with warfarin, whether prescribed by a GP or sold OTC. It may be that extra training is needed for pharmacy staff on warfarin interactions, or that the packaging of miconazole gel should be altered to include a warning on use with warfarin. If the gel cannot be sold safely, then that seems to beg the question, should it revert back to a POM?

Sonia Baker
Warfarin Pharmacist
Intrahealth Ltd, Co Durham

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Minor ailment scheme)
Next Topic (Asthma management)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal