Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7493 p300
15 March 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Novel vaccine reduces BP by targeting angiotensin II

Targeting angiotensin II with a virus-derived vaccine — CYT006-AngQb — has been shown to reduce hypertension in a study published last week in The Lancet (2008;371:821). However, the authors of an accompanying editorial (ibid, p788) raise concerns about the safety of circulating angiotensin II antibodies.

In the phase IIa study, 72 patients were randomised to receive either 100µg or 300µg of the experimental vaccine or placebo at weeks 0, 4 and 12. Ambulatory blood pressure was measured for a 24-hour period both before treatment and at 14 weeks.

Patients given 300µg of CYT006-AngQb experienced reductions in ambulatory daytime blood pressure (significant for systolic [P=0.015] but not for diastolic measurements), compared with those on placebo. The 300µg dose reduced the early morning surge in blood pressure for both systolic and diastolic measurements, compared with placebo (P<0.0001 and P=0.0035, respectively).

“The drop in blood pressure was especially pronounced in the early morning when the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system [RAAS] is most active and when most cardiovascular events occur,” the study authors write.

“This effect was not anticipated at the beginning of the study. By contrast, small molecule inhibitors of the [RAAS], while lowering blood pressure over 24 hours, do not affect the surge in early-morning blood pressure.”

Influenza-like symptoms occurred in three patients receiving the 100µg dose, in seven receiving 300µg and in none in the placebo group, and these effects were mild and transient. Such effects are thought to originate from the activation of the innate immune system that occurs after immunisation, the authors say.

They also suggest that optimising the immunisation regimen with shorter dosing intervals and a higher dose could lead to higher antibody titres and a more robust antihypertensive effect. “Later stage clinical trials will be needed to show efficacy and safety in a broader hypertensive population,” they add.

The authors of the editorial, Ola Samuelsson and Hans Herlitz from Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden, believe that vaccination against high blood pressure might solve many of the problems around non-compliance but they spell out a number of concerns over the safety of the strategy.

They say that the long half-life of the antibodies against angiotensin II — some 17 weeks — “raises the question of whether it will be safe to inhibit the actions of circulating angiotensin II for several months without the ability to quickly reverse inhibition, which is easily done for drugs by withdrawal of treatment”.

They acknowledge the study authors’ finding that the blood-pressure lowering effect was greatest during the early morning when the RAAS is most stimulated but point out that situations can occur when a patient would need a fully activated RAAS.

“Another important safety issue is whether repeated stimulation of the immune system by booster doses of an endogenous peptide linked to a virus-like particle can cause autoimmune disease,” they add.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal