Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search
|
This article |
| • Darzi review |
Darzi reviewEvidence for pharmacy innovationFrom Mr T. G. Burnham I read with interest the comments by Andy Murdock and others quoted in your report of the pharmacy engagement meeting in London (PJ, 8 March 2008, p265). Although prospective studies published in peer-reviewed journals are undoubtedly the gold standard for evaluating proposed innovations in pharmacy services, they may also be gold-plated. If pharmacy wants to introduce new services, it does not have the benefit of the budget and timescale that the industry has to introduce new drugs. So best use must be made of the evidence we already have. This clearly involves being able to locate properly designed studies in UK conditions where these exist. Where they do not, it will be necessary to weigh up the information that does exist — studies outside the UK, observational studies and practice reports. Some of these will be published in languages other
than English, and may be in journals that are not peer-reviewed, conference
proceedings or reports. However, it seems likely that there are many more reports on novel services which never get beyond their authors’ filing cabinets or computer files, and these, too, should be collected, catalogued, evaluated and disseminated. Tom Burnham |
|
Send your letter to The
Editor |
Next Topic (The profession) |